The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 321 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Richard Lochhead
I was going to say, “That’s not my problem.” [Laughter.]
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Richard Lochhead
I think that they want to comment from the policy and the legal sides. I will bring in the policy side first.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Richard Lochhead
From my limited knowledge of what other jurisdictions are doing, I think that all countries and jurisdictions are facing these dilemmas. We do not have a solution in the bill to that potentially growing and futuristic problem. The bill sets down thresholds or tests for what would be deemed a digital asset or property. If someone were to make a challenge along the lines of what you are speaking about in relation to AI and what may be deemed property that is produced by AI, it would be up to the courts to see whether that passed the test that this legislation sets. Those are big issues for the future.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Richard Lochhead
That will be in the Official Report.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Richard Lochhead
As you outlined in your opening remarks, the bill is trying to achieve a simple thing. Other legislation addresses many of the issues that you have mentioned in relation to divorce cases, or whatever. I am sure that members are familiar from their casework that, in divorce cases, things can be hidden that are not digital assets. That applies anyway; it is just part and parcel of the world that we live in, irrespective of whether something is a digital asset.
I am content that we can focus on the bill achieving what it sets out to achieve. Lots of other issues have been discussed, which is understandable because it is part of a wider debate that has come up in evidence to the committee and members are interested in it, but I make the point on behalf of the Government that I believe that the bill will achieve what it sets out to achieve.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Richard Lochhead
Officials and colleagues are well aware of what is happening elsewhere in the UK, so that is an important point, and we will make sure that that is the case going forward.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Richard Lochhead
As I have said before, yes.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Richard Lochhead
I noted the points that the witnesses made, but they also said that they felt that the approach was satisfactory. Clearly, that is linked to avoiding double selling—there must be safeguards in place to avoid double selling and therefore the systems that are used must be immutable so that records cannot be changed.
Ultimately, it will be for courts to decide, should they have to look at the matter in detail. However, anyone who is reading this will know what is being asked of the legislation and what it means with regard to not tampering with records and the fact that we cannot allow a system that permits double selling.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Richard Lochhead
We will reflect on that, and in particular on the point about the explanatory notes and so on. Some witnesses said that they would be reluctant for guidance to be issued because they are content that there is certainty in the bill. They said that they wanted the bill to be technology neutral, and pointed out that the world will change and that we cannot predict what those changes will be, so the more prescriptive we are, the more issues that could cause in the future.
I am happy to reflect on the evidence. Again, I noticed that there was a slight differentiation between the evidence from those who were coming at this from a legal perspective and the evidence from those who had a wider technology interest. Those who wanted the law to be clear as to the property status of digital assets were content. Obviously, however, there is a wider debate about some of the issues that other witnesses mentioned.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Richard Lochhead
I am happy to consider that. The committee will publish its report, and we will treat its recommendations very seriously.
There is a whole debate about providing more certainty on what is excluded from the bill—perhaps through carve-outs, which have been mentioned. Some witnesses said that we should not go down that road and that they were content that what was in the bill was defensible and that it achieved the right balance.
I cannot give you a categorical answer, but we will reflect on what the committee says about the need for further clarification.