The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 996 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Michael Matheson
Good morning. Sticking with the theme of infrastructure investment, there is anxiety about the cost of investment that is needed to meet our climate change targets. You heard earlier about the cost of things such as heat pumps and so on. There is a suggestion that we should just ditch the 2045 and 2050 net zero targets but still try to make some progress in tackling climate change.
Is it fair to say that there is a direct correlation between the degree of global warming or climate change and the amount of investment that we must make in adaptation as a result? If so, to what extent do you think that there is the risk that, if we ditch those national targets, we will simply push the costs on to investment in climate adaptation, which we will need to do more of?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Michael Matheson
So, delaying net zero involves a cost from an adaptation perspective, as investment would have to go into infrastructure.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Michael Matheson
As you say, there is a need to invest in infrastructure to meet the changes in our climate that we are experiencing. Given the capital investment profile of the Scottish and UK Governments and their infrastructure investment planning, do you see the scale of investment that is necessary to ensure that we have the right infrastructure in place to deal with the climate challenges that we face?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Michael Matheson
It feels to me that, by and large, a lot of infrastructure investment that takes place to deal with some of these challenges happens because of incidents occurring—we see a flood, so we put in flood-mitigation measures to deal with it.
You mentioned that we do not track that type of investment. The CCC gives independent advice to the Scottish and UK Governments. Are you able to quantify exactly how much either of those Governments is spending on climate adaptation specifically?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Michael Matheson
You mentioned the 2021 adaptation risk report and the figure of £5 billion to £10 billion. Is that an annual figure or is that figure over a five-year period, which is a period that a lot of capital investment programmes use?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Michael Matheson
It is for Iain Batho. If an employee in a company acted negligently and outwith the company’s procedures and that resulted in an act that caused serious or significant environmental harm, who would be prosecuted in that instance? Would it be the company or the individual who had acted outwith the company’s procedures in a way that resulted in the harm being caused?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Michael Matheson
Can I pick up on the point about the overlap in law that would exist if the bill was passed? I am interested from a prosecutorial point of view. Obviously, it is not uncommon for there to be areas of criminal law that cross over one another. Does that present any challenges for you as a prosecutor in deciding which route to follow to take forward a prosecution?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Michael Matheson
If the bill was framed in such a way and an act was carried out by a member of staff operating outwith the company’s procedures and where senior management knew nothing about what they were doing, I am struggling to understand how you would then prosecute.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Michael Matheson
Is the bill is clear enough on harm that is caused by a course of conduct that impacts over a period time? The bill also covers one-off incidents, but does it give sufficient clarity on incidents that occur over time that could be considered ecocide? Does the bill give sufficient definition on that or is there need for further clarity in that area? I will give Iain Batho a rest and put that question to Rachael Weir.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Michael Matheson
Good morning—just—or good evening, in Rachel Killean’s case. I want to pick up on the issue about the experience in France, and potentially in other parts of the EU, where an ecocide law has been introduced. France moved from an administrative liability process for dealing with environmental crime to a criminal liability scheme. That was one of the main changes resulting from the introduction of the ecocide law—is that correct?