The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2483 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Mark Ruskell
What I am hearing this morning is that it will be the third-generation fuels—the e-fuels—that will dominate and will be the future as we move forward, because of the potential conflict with growing biofeedstocks.
However, what might happen in, say, 10 or 20 years down the line, in a world in which the whole of society is electrified, and where we have electric-battery surface transport, hydrogen being used, electric heating and so on? All of those things are going to create a huge demand for generation. Our briefing notes suggest that, if we wanted to fully lean into e-fuels for aviation, we would need seven to eight times more electricity-generating capacity in the UK than we had in 2020.
It is not exactly the same situation as it is with biofuel, where you are competing with food and obviously there are limits to the amount of land that we have, but do you acknowledge that there will be a point where, even with renewable electricity generation, we will hit the buffers, because everything will be electrified and the need for generation is going to double, treble, quadruple or—potentially—quintuple in the years ahead? Do you have any thoughts on that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Mark Ruskell
I want to ask about the broader context, particularly around the changes in the UK emissions trading scheme, such as the withdrawal of the free allocation, and the international carbon trading scheme, which is the carbon offsetting and reduction scheme for international aviation—CORSIA. Do you think that the changes will have a significant impact on emissions reduction? How do you see those measures working? Celeste, I will start with you, and then I will take some views from around the panel.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Mark Ruskell
Are runway expansions, expansions in capacity and so on in any way compatible with our climate targets, given the ETS, SAF and other attempts to try to curb emissions?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Mark Ruskell
Do others want to come in?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Mark Ruskell
I am fine. Thanks, convener.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Mark Ruskell
Would anyone else like to come in on those questions? You will have to put your hand up, and then the convener will let you in.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Mark Ruskell
I think that Sebastian Eastham wanted to come in, too.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Mark Ruskell
That is fine, convener. I will maybe come back in later.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Mark Ruskell
Obviously, that legislation has had a cultural impact on the way that businesses operate.
I am interested in you addressing the question whether you think that an ecocide law would effectively encourage Scottish Government regulatory bodies to review existing legislation. I think that perhaps the assumption in this room is that Scotland’s environmental legislation is fit for purpose, but is that your view?
I am aware that, for example, the legislation for mineral permissions goes back to 1974, so there is the adoption in that case of regulations that, arguably, many communities believe are not fit for purpose in the modern world. What is your overall view of environmental legislation in Scotland? Do you think that an ecocide bill such as this one would drive reform? Is reform needed?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Mark Ruskell
Shivali Fifield, do you want to come back in on that point?