The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 698 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Rhoda Grant
Following on from what Brian Inkster said, I think that the commission is clear that it needs people to tell it about neglect in order for it to be able to investigate that. Asking the grazing committee to report on what is going on has not worked—it was clear that it would never work when that was legislated for. I am speaking not for the commission but from my understanding of what it was saying, which is that changing the process in order to allow others to report would take that reporting duty away from the grazing committee and would allow other people who saw neglect to report it.
It seems to me that neglect is one of the biggest issues that we hear about, and we hear about it all the time. Speak to anyone and they would say that. The cross-party group on crofting is always talking about neglect and about the fact that people are waiting to get crofts while others are holding crofts that they are doing nothing with. Therefore, I can understand why the commission has said, “Someone needs to tell us what’s going on. We can’t know everything unless we have people in every community telling us that.” However, that would be nigh on impossible. Might folk have a better idea about how such issues could be identified?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Rhoda Grant
How would we do that in legislation, given that, as you said earlier, some people know that they have the share floating around and that something is going on in the common grazing that will bring them an income, whereas—
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Rhoda Grant
What would you suggest as an alternative? Given that, at the moment, the commission does not respond within 28 days and people do not—or very seldom—get a decision in that time, how can we make the legislation work in a way that puts a bit of onus on the commission but is realistic?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Rhoda Grant
Yes.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Rhoda Grant
Under section 11, there is a proposed 10-year restriction to ensure that, if the commission resumes a croft and then assigns it to a tenant, that tenant cannot sell the assignation for 10 years. Does that strike the right balance in stopping the trade in crofts? Does it prevent the commission being accused of giving an asset to someone who will suddenly capitalise on it? We know the value of crofting assignations.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Rhoda Grant
On that point, it is about the shares that are out there now and have been separated. People are possibly not even aware that they have a share.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Rhoda Grant
We touched earlier on the length of time that it takes for the commission to respond. The bill takes away the time limit of 28 days for the commission to respond to an application for another purpose or use, but the 28-day limit for the crofter to respond to the commission is staying. Is that fair and reasonable? My understanding is that, in practice, nobody gets an answer in 28 days anyway, so are we simply putting into legislation what happens in practice?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Rhoda Grant
It would take one person a long time to get round every croft—I do not think that they would manage to do so in their lifetime. Should there be a reporting duty as part of the census? Should people say what they are doing with their croft?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Rhoda Grant
The bill is tidying up an awful lot of the things that were wrong with crofting. Eilidh Ross said that it is a bit boring and that, possibly, everyone is looking forward to a bill that deals with the policy issues, but are there any other tidying-up issues that need to be dealt with?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Rhoda Grant
I am sorry—I am jumping ahead.