Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Session 6: 13 May 2021 to 8 April 2026
  7. Current session: 14 May 2026 to 6 July 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 6 contributions

|

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Conduct in the Chamber

Meeting date: 25 June 2026

Jackie Baillie

I am relaxed about either option.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Conduct in the Chamber

Meeting date: 25 June 2026

Jackie Baillie

I am relaxed about which option is pursued. I could be persuaded to go for either.

However, I want to clarify a point that I think is fundamental to the operation of the Parliament. Under the first bullet point of paragraph 14, as set out in annex B of paper 3, it says:

“with remote participation limited to exceptional circumstances where prior consent has been granted by the Presiding Officers.”

We pride ourselves on trying to be a family-friendly Parliament, and there are many members with caring responsibilities. I am sure that it is not intended that, on each occasion that a member may have to go home to deal with something and need to vote remotely, they are required to get permission first. Can we get clarity on that particular issue? I would not want the wrong signal to be sent.

10:15

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Cross-Party Groups

Meeting date: 25 June 2026

Jackie Baillie

This parliamentary session is unprecedented in that six political parties are represented on the bureau. Some parties are larger than others, and, in this session, setting up cross-party groups will require securing at least one member from each party. That will be particularly challenging for the smaller parties, placing the onus on them to field members for multiple groups; otherwise, those groups cannot be established.

I am inclined to agree with you, convener, that requiring CPG membership to be drawn from four of the six parties is not unreasonable and would be welcomed by those who engage in cross-party groups.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Cross-Party Groups

Meeting date: 25 June 2026

Jackie Baillie

To bring a practical note to the discussion, cross-party groups have 120 days in which to set up, not including recess, so the clock is ticking. A number are already struggling, for two reasons. First, some members are saying that they want to wait to see what happens before volunteering to join cross-party groups, which reduces the pool. Secondly, we have placed a cap at 10, so, in reality, once members have committed to 10 cross-party groups, they cannot get involved in any others. They can, of course, attend them, but not as members.

We will also be interviewing all of the cross-party groups, if they are not simply repeats of previous ones, so we will have an opportunity to test how cross-party they are.

I would be very reluctant to require membership to be drawn from all six parties, because that would hand a veto to a particular party if it disagreed with a cross-party group’s topic. Much as I believe in consensus and working together, there are occasions when not everybody will agree, and that does not mean that the issue should not be highlighted. Therefore, I would absolutely reject the requirement being set at six. I am prepared to discuss my preference, but it cannot be six.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Decision on Taking Business in Private

Meeting date: 25 June 2026

Jackie Baillie

I suggest that we take items 4 and 5 in public. I accept that discussions of the work programme are usually held in private before the work programme is made public. However, I think that we as a committee should, where possible, operate with the presumption that we will do things in public, while, obviously, absenting those areas that are clearly sensitive. We should start as we mean to carry on; therefore, I move that we keep items 4 and 5 in public.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Interests

Meeting date: 25 June 2026

Jackie Baillie

I have no relevant interests to declare. I refer people to my entry in the register of members’ interests.