The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2372 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Stephen Kerr
Have you seen the minutes?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Stephen Kerr
I presume that there are Scottish Government documents that pertain to the First Minister’s engagement at that meeting—there must be.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Stephen Kerr
Can we have those to scrutinise?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Stephen Kerr
Is this SAFE that you are talking about? Is it the SPS agreement?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Stephen Kerr
The negotiating mandate?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Stephen Kerr
You rightly get exercised about the rights and powers of Parliament under the devolution settlement, but the problem with dynamic alignment is that it puts us into a worse position than we were in before we left the European Union, because Britain will have no role, other than third-party consultation, prior to any new directives or regulations, and we will have no choice but to accept them. If the UK Government took that line as its general approach to how it governs, you would object to that very strongly, and when it does you object very strongly, so why do you not object to such an arrangement with the European Union?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Stephen Kerr
You are doing a marvellous job of deflection. My final—
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Stephen Kerr
To be fair, you have made your point on that issue, but I want to make a point about the fact that the EU’s approach to this negotiation is very cynical, particularly in relation to the French national interest, when it comes to fishing rights. I think that we agreed on that in the chamber, so I just wanted to make sure that we were still in agreement on that.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Stephen Kerr
Yes. On the Thursday before the UK-EU summit, we had a debate—you might remember it, cabinet secretary, as you were the Government speaker. That morning’s Financial Times had highlighted the fact that the price to be paid for Britain’s ability to make a play for loans from the €150 billion security action for Europe—SAFE—defence fund was fishing rights: the TCA roll-over.
I think that we agreed that that was an unacceptable point of negotiation, given the precarious defence and security situation in Europe. You have rightly pointed out the concession on fishing, although it might have been made in principle, as Keith Brown says, prior to the morning of 19 March. However, on the morning of 19 March, the EU said that there would be no agreement unless we gave it a 12-year roll-over. That is awful, is it not? That is a terrible way to talk about defence and security. Do you still stand by what you said in our exchange in the chamber about the EU’s attitude towards defence and security and fishing rights?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Stephen Kerr
You just needed to read the newspapers to know that.