The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1124 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Jackie Dunbar
For clarification, I totally understand and agree with that. My fear was that we would put pressure on future foster carers to have to step up when, as Ms McCall said, normally, there is no “have to” about it. That was what I was trying to get at. I would not want us to discourage people from coming forward to be foster carers.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Jackie Dunbar
I have carefully reflected on the evidence that we heard during stage 1 and on stakeholders’ concerns regarding the lack of clarity about the definition of independent advocacy in the bill and I believe that my amendments 144 and 151 will address those concerns.
If passed, the amendments would create a requirement that the regulations that are currently provided for under section 4(1) must specify that care experience advocacy services should be independent and that those regulations will set out what criteria care experience advocacy services must meet in order to be considered as independent.
I have carefully considered the amendments from Roz McCall, Martin Whitfield and Ross Greer, which all seek, in varying ways, to add a more prescriptive statutory definition of independence to the bill. I am sympathetic to the intentions behind those amendments and their desire to provide greater clarity about how independent advocacy services will be delivered under the bill. However, I believe that, given the intended breadth of the lifelong right to access independent advocacy services under the provision, and its application across a range of circumstances, the inclusion of a restrictive definition might significantly impact on the range of persons who would have the capacity and competence to provide those services.
When we held a private session one evening with young people from Who Cares? Scotland, I heard them saying that they wanted to be able to choose who their advocate was. That person might be a teacher or a social worker. One young person said that a social worker could read by the expression on her face whether she wanted something or not. I think that some of the amendments that are before us might prevent young people from having such a person as an advocate. Local authorities have many different departments and services, but if we lump local services together as one—
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Jackie Dunbar
I agree, but I also believe that they should have the option of the person they trust the most, if that is their wish. I do not want them to be prevented from having the person they trust just because of, if I am being honest, a consideration about who pays that person’s wages.
I move amendment 144.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Jackie Dunbar
I said that they could be.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Jackie Dunbar
A teacher would not make decisions on the care-experienced person’s care, but they would be there to listen to the care-experienced person, if needed. I am not saying that the advocate should be a teacher. I am saying that the young person should have the right to choose. I was just using a teacher as an example, given what we heard in our evening session with young people. One young person said that they would want their social worker to be their advocate. Whether that is right or wrong is not for me to decide—that is for the young person to decide for themselves. It is a case of ensuring that we get it right for every child.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Jackie Dunbar
My intervention is similar to the question that John Mason asked. I do not know whether you have come to this point yet, but I am genuinely not sure whether you are suggesting that foster parents would need to sign up to opening their door 20 years or more down the line. I worry that that would stop foster parents coming forward.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Jackie Dunbar
Yes.
12:15
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Jackie Dunbar
In my eyes, a teacher could be an independent advocate, if we were not limiting it by saying that the advocate had to be independent—in other words, someone from outwith the local authority. It is the young person’s right to have independent advocacy, and they should always be offered it.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Jackie Dunbar
I feel as though I am going down a rabbit hole.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Jackie Dunbar
You have just said it—the local authority would have to have a contract with anybody who performed the role. Does that mean that nobody could be an independent advocate, because the local authority would be paying for their services? In my view, you have just blown the whole argument out of the water, because, at the end of the day, the local authority would be paying for an independent advocate. Those services would be paid for.