The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 571 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Beatrice Wishart
The latest figures that I have show that it costs around £130,000 to operate Dogs Against Drugs each year. The charity is not asking for £130,000 but for some kind of sustainable model going forward. It raises funds through its corporate work. It has bingo evenings and raffles and so on, which I am not sure is a sensible way to continue. Although it is well supported by the community, that is not a sensible way to support the police with deterrence and the prevention of drugs coming into the island.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Beatrice Wishart
Thank you for inviting me to the committee.
I think that members all know the background of the community-led charity Dogs Against Drugs, which was started over 20 years ago. It aims to act as a deterrent and it also has an educational purpose.
I am very grateful for the engagement with the justice secretary, and the charity was grateful to receive £30,000 last year, which helped it over a financial difficulty for that year. However, year on year, the charity is struggling with funds to try to offer the service, which Police Scotland has said is very valuable. The Shetland Times petition was quite narrow in suggesting that cashback for communities should be extended more to the communities that have such charities, but I think that Dogs Against Drugs is a unique charity. It provides a public service that is obviously valued by Police Scotland but also by the community.
I suggest that it is long past time, given the charity’s history and that we would not want to see the loss of drugs dogs in the community, that the Government found a more suitable funding model to ensure that its very valuable work continues. For example, the value of drugs seized in 2024 over 12 months was £554,000—that was all in our community, which has 23,000 people.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Beatrice Wishart
To look at the agreement from another angle, what potential benefits might it bring? I am thinking of whether it improves exports to the EU and whether more EU vessels will land catches in Scottish ports and fish processors, which we heard about earlier. Do you have any thoughts on that?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Beatrice Wishart
In relation to the SPS agreement, are there any specific products that might benefit more than others?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Beatrice Wishart
Is it about taking swifter action rather than waiting for the enforcement procedure that is available at the moment?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Beatrice Wishart
Okay.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Beatrice Wishart
Good morning to the witnesses. I have just locked myself out of my laptop. Thankfully, I have a printed copy of the papers in front of me.
NatureScot referenced the modernisation of the aims, which you touched on in an earlier answer. It also said that the proposed additional list would be
“useful in clarifying the intent of the aims”,
which
“could be complemented by the preparation of a national policy statement on National Parks.”
Does the Scottish Government intend to progress that recommendation?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Beatrice Wishart
The committee heard support in principle for national park authorities being able to issue fixed-penalty notices in respect of bylaws. However, concerns have been expressed that that power could detract from the role of ranger services in engaging with the public, providing education and supporting voluntary compliance. Is there a risk that having powers to issue fixed-penalty notices would detract from the ranger services role?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Beatrice Wishart
Thank you.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Beatrice Wishart
Cabinet secretary, you have spoken a lot about being agile, flexible and responsive. However, some witnesses have said that 10 years is too long to wait for a review of the targets and that more responsive measures should be built into the bill. There has been a suggestion that Environmental Standards Scotland should be able to trigger a review if targets are not on track. What is your response to such suggestions?