There are 87,440 results relating to "Getting the Inactive Active"
Order by
|
Official Report
Meeting date:
15 February 2007
Plenary, 15 Feb 2007
Thirdly, it should consider the range of activities that are provided; Robin Harper identified that issue.
Official Report
Meeting date:
5 December 2006
Subordinate Legislation Committee, 05 Dec 2006
We appear to have time to ask that question, and it might be useful to get an answer to it before we consider what we might ultimately recommend.
Official Report
Meeting date:
5 September 2005
Subordinate Legislation Committee, 05 Sep 2005
As a result, it was decided that, in orders to get things done on time, this approach should be taken.
Official Report
Meeting date:
9 February 2005
Justice 1 Committee, 09 Feb 2005
You might not be content with that, but it is your answer. I just wanted to get the explanation from the minister.
Official Report
Meeting date:
27 October 2004
Justice 1 Committee, 27 Oct 2004
I admit that I was thinking that we were getting two permanent judges to deal with the backlog and that, somewhere along the line, we would consider an order for two temporary judges to deal with the Bonomy reforms in the way that the convener has outlined.From our previous work, we understand that the Executive's view was that two judges were needed for two years to deal with the impact of the Bonomy review, but we are now getting two more judges permanently, which means that, for their first two years, they will probably fail to make any significant impact on the backlog in criminal appeals and civil business but that they might have an impact on those aspects in the fullness of time.
Official Report
Meeting date:
24 February 2004
Subordinate Legislation Committee, 24 Feb 2004
As the bill stands, the amounts could be changed in any way. Should we get the Executive to confirm that that is the case?
Official Report
Meeting date:
11 January 2000
Audit Committee, 11 Jan 2000
You are happy with the notes, but you seek clarification of why we cannot get the list. Yes, especially as one already exists.
Official Report
Meeting date:
9 January 2007
Subordinate Legislation Committee, 09 Jan 2007
It is going to wait and see if the order gets through the lead committee and Parliament.
Official Report
Meeting date:
16 May 2006
Subordinate Legislation Committee, 16 May 2006
It is a week on Thursday, so we could get a response back by next week. Is it agreed that we will ask for a bit more clarification?
Official Report
Meeting date:
2 September 2003
Subordinate Legislation Committee, 02 Sep 2003
I note that, in the last line of the e-mail, it is accepted that some of our points are valid, but not all. We have to wait until we get the letter before discussing the situation further.
