This search includes all content on the Scottish Parliament website, except for Votes and Motions. All Official Reports (what has been said in Parliament) and Questions and Answers are available from 1999. You can refine your search by adding and removing filters.
The Commission has three options, the last of which is best. The options are: the status quo; letting individual producers develop their own schemes, which would create one EU labelling scheme; and having EU requirements for voluntary eco-labelling schemes.
I seek reassurance; I am not sure whether Professor Norrie is my best point of reference on that. If individuals in the circumstances that I have described will not be affected by amendment 1, I will withdraw any opposition to it.
The note says:"09/01 Communities Committee deadline for written evidence".That deadline is now 30 January. We would still be working as best we could. That means that we would have to consider our draft report by the end of January and agree the final report by the beginning of February so that we could get it to the Communities Committee by 5 February.
We also want to avoid any delay to the application of the measures in Scotland, because they will be a useful deterrent to future incidents.The Sewel motion is the best course of action in the circumstances.
We might ask the Executive why it has not followed what is generally considered to be best practice in this field.Taxi Drivers' Licences (Carrying of Guide Dogs and Hearing Dogs) (Scotland) Regulations 2002 (SSI 2002/500) Taxi Drivers' Licences (Carrying of Guide Dogs and Hearing Dogs) (Scotland) Regulations 2002 (SSI 2002/500) I suggest that members bone ...
We could try to get the real details from the health boards. Would the best thing be to bring that back to a further committee meeting, with a range of questions that we might ask the health boards about what their pain services cover?
The decision we have come to is that, having heard from the petitioner, and having read the paperwork on how the commercial court works, that suggestion would be the best model.Obviously, we would have to hear another point of view.
While some of those amendments might have been anticipated, Mrs Gillon's amendment—which I am sure was lodged with the best of intentions—has not previously been the subject of wider discussion.
Naming and shaming is the sanction that we should choose; we should not consider fines. Naming and shaming is the best way forward. I do not think that there is a problem.