Skip to main content
Loading…

Search

There are 4,701 results relating to "V"

|

Refine your search

Select from the available filters to refine your search


Available filters:

Can't find what you're looking for?

If you're having trouble finding the information you want, please contact [email protected].

Official Report Meeting date: 17 May 2000

Plenary, 17 May 2000

I will not enter into a sterile argument about Glasgow v Edinburgh, but Glasgow supported the Parliament and demands its fair share.
Official Report Meeting date: 9 November 1999

Education, Culture and Sport Committee, 09 Nov 1999

I understand that the minister is lucky enough to be going to the Scotland v England game next Saturday—I hope that that ticket was obtained legitimately.
Official Report Meeting date: 31 October 2006

Justice 1 Committee and Justice 2 Committee (Joint Meeting), 31 Oct 2006

There was also the case of Somerville and others v Scottish ministers, and Lady Paton made a judgment on the time bar in relation to that case.
Official Report Meeting date: 20 September 2006

Environment and Rural Development Committee, 20 Sep 2006

Lamlash bay is in no way comparable to Loch Ryan, the Gare loch or Broad bay, because it has two entrances—it comprises an island and a bay and is not a V-notch in the land. I am asking whether research there would be of benefit.
Official Report Meeting date: 2 February 2006

Plenary, 02 Feb 2006

One of the by-products of football banning orders will be that for the first time robust statistics in Scotland will be collected about arrests near or around football grounds.I am grateful for the time afforded to me by Lothian and Borders police when I recently spent a day with them at a Hibs v Rangers football game. Thankfully, it was quiet with no arres...
Official Report Meeting date: 26 January 2005

Justice 1 Committee, 26 Jan 2005

I refer in particular to the case of Webster v Dominick. We have been asked to note that there was a guilty plea in the case, so the relevancy of the charge was not tested.
Official Report Meeting date: 28 January 2004

Plenary, 28 Jan 2004

Just for the clarity of the debate and bearing in mind the lack of appeal under part V of the record of needs, can Brian Monteith be more specific about which rights he claims the bill will take away?
Official Report Meeting date: 17 December 2003

Justice 1 Committee, 17 Dec 2003

That person would be likely to challenge their conviction, as happened in the case of R v Jones in England. The accused might say that they want the court to hear the evidence it did not hear and then decide on the safety of the conviction.
Official Report Meeting date: 23 September 2003

Justice 2 Committee, 23 Sep 2003

The provision is designed to address an unfortunate problem that arose in the Grimmond v HMA case, which is mentioned in the policy memorandum to the bill.
Official Report Meeting date: 31 October 2001

Social Justice Committee, 31 Oct 2001

There's a surprise.Will you outline more fully your role in the implementation of part V of the Police Act 1997? The Scottish Executive justice department has invited Volunteer Development Scotland to run the centrally registered body.

Can't find what you're looking for?

If you're having trouble finding the information you want, please contact [email protected].