There are 4,709 results relating to "V"
|
Official Report
Meeting date:
28 January 2004
Plenary, 28 Jan 2004
Just for the clarity of the debate and bearing in mind the lack of appeal under part V of the record of needs, can Brian Monteith be more specific about which rights he claims the bill will take away?
Official Report
Meeting date:
6 March 2002
Plenary, 06 Mar 2002
Does the minister agree that questions remain from the case of Her Majesty's Advocate v Anderson, which to some extent defined the relationship between a solicitor and their client?
Official Report
Meeting date:
28 March 2001
Plenary, 28 Mar 2001
I move amendment S1M-1797.1, to leave out from "on the tourism industry" to end and insert:"in Scotland on the tourism industry and businesses within the affected areas; believes that conflicting information about the disease, both at home and abroad, further jeopardises Scottish tourism; further believes that more must be done to secure the future of the tourism industry, and therefore calls upon the Scottish Executive to implement the following recovery plan for tourism and businesses within the affected areas: (i) immediate action to enable and ensure efficient crisis management, including a public information campaign through the press and broadcast media to make people aware of what can and cannot be done during the crisis, (ii) a moratorium on liability for business rates and council tax, (iii) a moratorium to be sought by the Scottish Executive from HM Treasury on liability for payment of national taxes, (iv) the establishment of a designated crisis area within the local authority area of Dumfries and Galloway to which the foregoing moratoria would apply, (v...
Official Report
Meeting date:
28 February 2001
Plenary, 28 Feb 2001
One way of getting over that—and over the innate business of us v them, which we have regrettably inherited from Westminster and which many of us hoped we would get away from—would be for the minister to get together representatives of all of the six parties in the chamber as well as other relevant people and start work on an agreed Scottish environmental p...
Official Report
Meeting date:
14 February 2001
Plenary, 14 Feb 2001
Will the Executive accept that, as it passes the buck, some of the most vulnerable people in the country are in the midst of it all: the frail elderly, those suffering from mental illness and with learning difficulties, not to mention Scotland's vast army of carers, who save the country no less than £3.4 billion each year.Lastly, in the light of Lord Hardie's judgment in the case of McGregor v South Lanarkshire, which is no longer sub judice, will the minister state what steps have been taken to ensure that Scotland's local authorities now have sufficient funding to fulfil their obligations—clarified by Lord Hardie's judgment—to immediately place in long-term residential or nursing home care all those who have been assessed as requiring such care?
Official Report
Meeting date:
7 February 2001
Plenary, 07 Feb 2001
That was before Lord Hardie's judgment in the case of MacGregor v South Lanarkshire Council. Lord Hardie's judgment made it clear that local authorities have a duty to provide immediate nursing care for everyone who is assessed as requiring it.
Official Report
Meeting date:
26 October 2006
Plenary, 26 Oct 2006
I can think of many things that fishermen have done. Alasdair Morrison mentioned the V-notching and returning of female lobsters.
Official Report
Meeting date:
26 January 2005
Plenary, 26 Jan 2005
It is stylised abuse, which is without venom and is often self-mocking.The kind of abuse that we cannot tolerate in sport is the abuse that carries with it venom, division and social consequences that go beyond the theatre of the football stadium. Events at the England v Spain football match last autumn and the incident at Love Street that Wendy Alexander h...
Official Report
Meeting date:
25 February 2004
Plenary, 25 Feb 2004
We agree with the Law Society for Scotland and with Lord Rodger that to cite the R v Jones case in England or other European cases is to fail to recognise the substantial differences in criminal procedure between jurisdictions.
Official Report
Meeting date:
18 September 2002
Plenary, 18 Sep 2002
We should remember that the Executive was simply trying to meet our obligations under the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and the European Court of Human Rights' judgment on the A v the United Kingdom case. We still have to take those issues on board.I also disagreed with my committee colleagues' view that the current law in Scotland does not requi...
