There are 4,331 results relating to "V"
|
Official Report
Meeting date:
30 January 2001
Finance Committee, 30 Jan 2001
I do not think that the line contains any part V charges, as they are not yet active.
Official Report
Meeting date:
25 February 2003
Subordinate Legislation Committee, 25 Feb 2003
That relates to a decision of the Privy Council in R v The Lord Advocate. I think that the case involved somebody called Rourke.
Questions and Answers
Date answered:
23 January 2006
S2W-21786
To ask the Scottish Executive how many (a) fatalities, (b) fatal accidents, (c) serious accidents and (d) minor accidents have taken place in each year since the Route Action Plan for the A76 was published in 1996 between (i) New Cumnock and Kirkconnel, (ii) Kirkconnel and Sanquhar, (iii) Sanquhar and Thornhill, (iv) Thornhill and Auldgirth and (v) Auldgir...
Official Report
Meeting date:
24 May 2006
Justice 1 Committee, 24 May 2006
How is the Crown dealing with the decisions in the Holland v HMA and Sinclair v HMA cases? It accepts that there should be disclosure and has said that the information and statements that it has in its papers will be disclosed, but often those are not there.
Official Report
Meeting date:
19 November 2002
Justice 2 Committee, 19 Nov 2002
However, for public protection, non-conviction information is released as part of the criminal record disclosure arrangements provided under part V of the 1997 act. During its evidence sessions, the committee has, therefore, sought the views of others on the proposal and has tested the Executive about it several times.
Official Report
Meeting date:
8 March 2004
Stirling-Alloa-Kincardine Railway and Linked Improvements Bill Committee, 08 Mar 2004
You are obviously entitled to your interpretation of the cases but, with respect, I disagree with it. You mentioned three cases: S v France; Guerra and others v Italy; and Baggs v the UK.
Official Report
Meeting date:
1 November 2005
Justice 2 Committee, 01 Nov 2005
There are obvious interactions between that and what the European convention on human rights states about self-incrimination, and so on.A very important case is Mowbray v Crowe 1993 JC 212. I do not want to bore you with too many of the details, but it is a useful case.
Official Report
Meeting date:
28 January 2003
Rural Development Committee, 28 Jan 2003
I will also be interested to hear the minister's view on the matter. I am advised that the Alexander v the Royal Hotel case indicates that the powers already exist.There is another issue that interests me.
Official Report
Meeting date:
16 January 2001
Rural Development Committee, 16 Jan 2001
I will try to do so very simply if I may, convener. None of part V of the regulations exists in the equivalent English instrument.
Official Report
Meeting date:
27 March 2002
Justice 2 Committee, 27 Mar 2002
If we fictionalised this, no one would believe it. I am thinking of Jarndyce v Jarndyce—the single case of legal obfuscation—in Charles Dickens's famous book.
