I understand what the minister is saying, and none of us would disagree with where he is trying to get to. However, the amendment that was agreed to today means that, under the bill, a person will be exempt if they speak to someone who represents the area in which they work, they will be exempt if they speak to the raft of MSPs who represent the area in which they live, and they will be exempt if they speak to people who represent the area where they carry on their “activity”—I do not know what is meant by “activity”; maybe the minister will clarify that.