There are 87,539 results relating to "Getting the Inactive Active"
Order by
|
SPICe briefings
Date published:
15 March 2024
Public participation in the Scottish Parliament: Understanding the core principles of deliberative democracy and creating a framework for measuring impact - Annex 3 - Examples of PACT practice and delivery aligned with Roberts et al’s Ladder of Community Participation
Annex 3 - Examples of PACT practice and delivery aligned with Roberts et al’s Ladder of Community Participation
The tables in this section show PACT activity to date, mapped out against Roberts et al's Ladder of Community Participation.
Committee reports
Date published:
14 September 2023
Culture in Communities: The challenges and opportunities in delivering a place-based approach - The challenges of project funding for place-based culture
Retrieved from <a href="https://www.parliament.scot/-/media/files/committees/constitution-europe-external-affairs-and-culture-committee/note-of-external-engagement-visits.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.parliament.scot/-/media/files/committees/constitution-europe-external-affairs-and-culture-committee/note-of-external-engagement-visits.pdf</a>
Built Environment Forum Scotland (BEFS) reflected that “there is a trope that nobody will pay to fix the roof but that, if you tell them what is happening underneath it, you might get...
Official Report
Meeting date:
5 September 2012
Economy, Energy and Tourism Committee 05 September 2012
I wonder whether there might also be an opportunity. How much does tourist activity by visitors from abroad feed into benefits further down the line with, say, Scottish businesses getting future export business from people who previously came into contact with them?
SPICe briefings
Date published:
13 October 2017
Scotland's Employment by Industry and Geography
And the remaining 6,000 to beverage activity employment.
Social work activities without accommodation declined by 12,000.
Official Report
Meeting date:
29 May 2020
Economy, Energy and Fair Work Committee 29 May 2020
As we pivot human and financial resources, our conversation with the Government and the Cabinet is about how we will get the balance right. We are in the midst of that and we are working actively to make sure that we retain the balance as best we can within the resource envelope that we have.
Official Report
Meeting date:
20 December 2016
Meeting of the Parliament 20 December 2016
Let us get on with it—that is what the interests of Scotland demand.
Questions and Answers
Date answered:
7 November 2017
S5W-12022
We are however concerned about the transparency of the Soft Drinks lndustry Levy. To ensure Scotland gets its fair share, we plan to engage with the UK Government and seek further clarification on how the levy is allocated to the Scottish Government.
Official Report
Meeting date:
13 November 2013
Local Government and Regeneration Committee 13 November 2013
That is led not by our senior procurement manager, but our head of community and cultural services because we strongly believe that getting the third sector more actively engaged in how it works with us has to be done through our community services.
Official Report
Meeting date:
16 March 2022
Criminal Justice Committee 16 March 2022
Essentially, I want to get a feel from you as to how we have ended up where we are with the proposals.
Last updated:
29 August 2023
JSP2017to2018_Final
Jamie Greene moved amendment S5M-08497.2— As an amendment to motion S5M-08497 in the name of Humza Yousaf (The Promotion of Active Travel in Scotland), after “cycling;” insert “notes the lack of progress made in encouraging active travel, namely in cycling, where it is likely that the 10% of all journeys being made by bike in 2020 target is to be missed; acknowledges that budget cuts to active travel in previous annual budgets has had a negative impact on progress; notes its concern over reports on the lack of cohesion and contact between Transport Scotland and local authorities relating to the implementation of active travel plans; underlines that insufficient active transport infrastructure impedes the potential success of this plan;” After debate, the amendment was disagreed to ((DT) by division: For 55, Against 58, Abstentions 0).
