This search includes all content on the Scottish Parliament website, except for Votes and Motions. All Official Reports (what has been said in Parliament) and Questions and Answers are available from 1999. You can refine your search by adding and removing filters.
Few, if any, of the changes have been controversial, as Gil Paterson said, and credit for that is due to the work done by members of the committee and by John Patterson and the committee clerks, whom I thank.
Questions and Answers
Date answered:
17 January 2002
It referred to the prior answer given to Des McNulty on 29 November 2001 (S1W-20533) in which I promised to publish next summer a report from the Performance Audit Group.
Questions and Answers
Date answered:
17 January 2002
It referred to the prior answer given to Des McNulty on 29 November 2001 (S1W-20533) in which I promised to publish next summer a report from the Performance Audit Group.
Questions and Answers
Date answered:
17 January 2002
It referred to the prior answer given to Des McNulty on 29 November 2001 (S1W-20533) in which I promised to publish next summer a report from the Performance Audit Group.
Questions and Answers
Date answered:
17 January 2002
It referred to the prior answer given to Des McNulty on 29 November 2001 (S1W-20533) in which I promised to publish next summer a report from the Performance Audit Group.
Questions and Answers
Date answered:
17 January 2002
It referred to the prior answer given to Des McNulty on 29 November 2001 (S1W-20533) in which I promised to publish next summer a report from the Performance Audit Group.
Questions and Answers
Date answered:
17 January 2002
It referred to the prior answer given to Des McNulty on 29 November 2001 (S1W-20533) in which I promised to publish next summer a report from the Performance Audit Group.
Questions and Answers
Date answered:
17 January 2002
It referred to the prior answer given to Des McNulty on 29 November 2001 (S1W-20533) in which I promised to publish next summer a report from the Performance Audit Group.
He states:"The letter of intent which was issued to FCAM on 26 January 2001 did not require the company to submit a Performance Bond, a requirement which had been notified to tenderers."