This search includes all content on the Scottish Parliament website, except for Votes and Motions. All Official Reports (what has been said in Parliament) and Questions and Answers are available from 1999. You can refine your search by adding and removing filters.
In particular, I refer members to paragraphs 90 to 96 of the report.The European and External Relations Committee has requested a response by Friday 26 January. Do members wish me to express any views in a letter to that committee?
Might members be prepared to suggest to the Education Committee that, if it identifies any actions that could be taken by another Parliament, it should express a desire that that happen, so that that can add weight to deliberations that might take place elsewhere?
We shall ask the question then.No points arise in relation to section 26 on ancillary provision. Similarly, no points arise in relation to section 27 on orders and regulations.
They are now drawn up by people working together, so we know where the sites are. There is merit in engaging people in the debate, in providing a higher degree of certainty and in specifying at strategic level sites that will be available for development—not the small sites, b...
I know that that was not what Helen Eadie sought to do, but that is the practical effect.In any event, the tax credits already include an element that is intended to take some account of the cost of school meals.
Is ann a' leudachadh a bhitheas sinn ma bheir Riaghaltas na h-Alba dhuinn an cothrom.Tha na h-uimhir de dh'ainmean-àite agus de shoighnichean ann an Gàidhlig.
Islanders from the island of Arran to the Butt of Lewis would suffer.Phil Gallie of the Conservative party took us on his usual anti-European tour de force—I hope that he will forgive my using that expression.
Questions and Answers
Date answered:
26 January 2007
It is not possible to repealsection (26)(2) of the Salmon and Freshwater Fisheries (Consolidation) (Scotland)Act 2003 through the Aquaculture and Fisheries (Scotland) Bill.