This search includes all content on the Scottish Parliament website, except for Votes and Motions. All Official Reports (what has been said in Parliament) and Questions and Answers are available from 1999. You can refine your search by adding and removing filters.
Retrieved from https://yourviews.parliament.scot/ecyp/children-care-care-experience-services-planning/consultation/view_respondent?uuId=312631632 Others expressed concern about how specialist panel members could affect the dynamics of a hearing and/or skew the focus towards one aspect of the child or young person's care.
Where an individual MSP meets with the review lead in private, views expressed will not be attributed to that individual MSP, nor will they (or any third parties referenced) be identified, in the review report.
As quotas for committee membership are drawn from the composition of the Parliament, some witnesses suggested there were limitations and practical challenges to delivering more. There was a note of caution expressed in terms of the impact this may have on women in certain parties being required to populate these committees.Â
The Cabinet Secretary was also unable to commit to the Scottish Government laying a further instrument at a later date to amend this instrument regarding the River Endrick in the event of further engagement with the Association.
Members expressed concern about the lack of clarity from the Scottish Government on its timescale for introducing the new data col...
The report illustrates that in 2023, under the 2025 scheme changes, the payment rate per calf would have been higher due to lower number of eligible calves. Some stakeholders expressed frustration during the Government’s consultation.
Witnesses giving evidence to the Committee on 10 September all expressed the view that while the addition of a new Care Outcome was both welcome and useful, a number of additional dimensions would need to be considered.
Committee consideration
In its Stage 1 Report, the majority of the Committee expressed concern about how this power might be used by future administrations and recommended that the procedure be upgraded to the affirmative procedure.
There was not an overall agreement on funding allocations between stakeholders, although many views were expressed regarding funding arrangements between schemes and the distribution between farms and crofts.