This search includes all content on the Scottish Parliament website, except for Votes and Motions. All Official Reports (what has been said in Parliament) and Questions and Answers are available from 1999. You can refine your search by adding and removing filters.
The Committee also has concerns about the proposed safeguarding mechanism in section 6(6) of the Bill, which would necessitate the involvement of an independent actuary. The Committee notes the views expressed by some giving evidence that the inclusion of this mechanism in itself suggests that the independence of a solicitor is compromised by not ring-fenci...
Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database [accessed 19 October 2017] Note PPS is an artificial currency unit, which is used within the European Union in order to express summary economic indicators, as well as carry out spatial comparisons, by eliminating price differences among member states.
Committee reports
Date published:
22 September 2017
Interpretation by local authorities
Mike Flynn of the Scottish Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals had no problems with the definitions in the Bill.iEnvironment, Climate Change and Land Reform, Official Report, 13 June 2017, Col 12 However, he did express concerns over local authorities adopting 32 different positions.
The role of the Civil Litigation Bill
Concern has been expressed that people are not able to defend legal rights or enforce obligations because taking legal action is too expensive.
Supporters of the proposals highlight a need for a new offence to allow the effective prosecution of cases involving controlling and coercive behaviour which is emotionally or psychologically abusive. Concerns have also been expressed. These include both a fear of over-criminalisation and concerns that prosecutions might be difficult in practice.
People are generally living further away from people that they know and where they work, which influences journey length and modal choice. Professor Rye expressed disappointment that this was not incorporated in the draft CCP.
People are generally living further away from people that they know and where they work, which influences journey length and modal choice. Professor Rye expressed disappointment that this was not incorporated in the draft CCP.
Does the cabinet secretary also agree that this is quite a clear issue to be resolved—either people believe in the devolution settlement or they do not—and that it is time that the UK Government expressed in a proper way that it believes in that settlement?