- Asked by: Ariane Burgess, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 12 December 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi Gougeon on 23 December 2022
To ask the Scottish Government, when considering European Protected Species Licence applications, whether it will reject calculations to determine how many cetaceans would be disturbed or injured by an Acoustic Deterrent Device (ADD) if those calculations are based on an incorrect assumption that cetaceans are evenly spread over a large sea area and do not travel in pods or favour certain areas.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S6W-13105 on 23 December 2022. All answers to written Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at https://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/written-questions-and-answers
- Asked by: Ariane Burgess, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 12 December 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi Gougeon on 23 December 2022
To ask the Scottish Government, when considering European Protected Species Licence applications, whether it will reject calculations to determine how many cetaceans would be disturbed or injured by an Acoustic Deterrent Device (ADD) based on a model that can only predict how many will be disturbed at one moment in time and makes no allowance for the movement of the animals during the periods of time the device is operating.
Answer
All applications for EPS licences are considered on a case by cases basis and it is expected that applicants use appropriate models and calculations such as those set out in the Marine Scotland guidance document - faq_adds_and_eps_including_annex_1_and_annex_2_-_version_5_-october_2021_-_final.pdf (marine.gov.scot) . Relevant models use data that is the best current representation of the locations where cetaceans are expected to be found.
Marine Scotland is currently updating this guidance document to include finer resolution species density surfaces and this will be published early in 2023. All applications for EPS licences will be expected to follow the updated guidance.
- Asked by: Beatrice Wishart, MSP for Shetland Islands, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Monday, 05 December 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenny Gilruth on 23 December 2022
To ask the Scottish Government when the Serco NorthLink Ferries booking system will open for bookings for dates beyond 31 March 2023.
Answer
Fares on the Northern Isles Ferry Services network have been frozen until the end of March 2023 to help combat the ongoing cost crisis facing communities across Scotland.
I appreciate the need to get bookings released so that businesses and individuals can plan ahead, and aim to confirm fares and open bookings beyond 31 March as soon as possible.
- Asked by: Neil Bibby, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 09 December 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi Gougeon on 23 December 2022
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6W-11897 by Mairi Gougeon on 17 November 2022, (a) how much and (b) what percentage of its overall allocation to the Community Led Local Development Fund has been allocated by Local Action Groups to staffing and resourcing, and (i) how much and (ii) what percentage was allocated to staffing and resourcing by each group.
Answer
For staffing and resourcing, the Scottish Government set a maximum staffing support rate of 15% of their total allocation or £57,143 for individual Local Action Group (LAG) areas. However, LAGs could use their revenue allocation to source additional freelance support from out with their Local Authority where needed.
Area spend is ongoing and until all claims have been processed at the end of the financial year, an accurate figure cannot be given for staffing and resourcing costs.
The LAG allocation breakdown is provided in the following table;
LAG Area | Total allocation | Guideline A&A* |
Aberdeenshire North | £394,296.00 | £59,144.40 |
Aberdeenshire South | £530,694.00 | £79,604.10 |
Angus | £288,469.00 | £43,270.35 |
Argyll & Islands | £618,889.00 | £92,833.35 |
Ayrshire | £533,604.00 | £80,040.60 |
Cairngorms | £281,606.00 | £42,240.90 |
Dumfries and Galloway | £665,492.00 | £99,823.80 |
Fife | £279,306.00 | £41,895.90 |
Forth Valley and Lomond | £213,746.00 | £32,061.90 |
Greater Renfrewshire | £115,520.00 | £17,328.00 |
Highland | £1,069,878.00 | £160,481.70 |
Kelvin Valley and Falkirk | £140,600.00 | £21,090.00 |
Lanarkshire | £282,826.00 | £42,423.90 |
Moray | £292,405.00 | £43,860.75 |
Orkney | £188,330.00 | £28,249.50 |
Outer Hebrides | £255,806.00 | £38,370.90 |
Rural Perth and Kinross | £447,098.00 | £67,064.70 |
Scottish Borders | £487,275.00 | £73,091.25 |
Shetland | £188,538.00 | £28,280.70 |
Tyne Esk | £204,382.00 | £30,657.30 |
West Lothian | £151,240.00 | £22,686.00 |
*A&A = administration and animation
- Asked by: Neil Bibby, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 09 December 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi Gougeon on 23 December 2022
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6W-11899 by Mairi Gougeon on 17 November 2022, how many applications for funding from the Ayrshire Rural and Islands Ambition (ARIA) Fund indirectly included local authorities as beneficiaries, and how many, if any, progressed to the assessment stage.
Answer
There were no applications to the Ayrshire Rural and Islands Ambition (ARIA) Fund that indirectly included local authorities as beneficiaries.
- Asked by: Neil Bibby, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 09 December 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi Gougeon on 23 December 2022
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6W-12031 by Mairi Gougeon on 17 November 2022, which 16 organisations that applied to the Ayrshire Rural and Islands Ambition (ARIA) Fund progressed from the technical check stage to the assessment stage; which organisation failed the technical check process, and what the technical check was that it failed.
Answer
The outcome of the technical checks is detailed in the following table:
Project/Organisation | Decision |
Carbon Reduction – Adventure Centre for Education | Approved |
Dunlop Dairy Cheese Shop & Tasting Room | Deferred |
Disabled access plus Disabled Toilet and Additional Toilet – Hareshaw Community Hall SCIO | Approved |
Renewable Energy Infrastructure to New Tourist Accommodation Development – Millport, Jack Alt Stays | Approved |
Little Peru Green Start, Little Peru Ltd | Deferred |
The Community Regeneration of Millport Town Hall Ltd | Rejected |
Arran Green Funding for Future – Arran Pioneer CIC | Rejected |
Gaiety on Tour – Ayr Gaiety Partnership | Approved |
The Geisland Project – Beith CDT | Approved |
Access to Community for All – Crossroads Community Hubs Ltd | Approved |
Ailsa Craig Visitor Centre for Feasibility Study – Girvan Town Team (on behalf of Girvan Community Led Tourism) | Approved |
Brand Ambassador/Distillery Production Assistant – Isle of Cumbrae Distiller | Approved |
Paths Network Feasibility Study – Kirkimichael Village Renaissance | Deferred |
Newmilns Regeneration Feasibility Study – Newmilns Regeneration Association | Deferred |
Business Sustainability and Resilience Advisor – Visit Arran Ltd | Approved |
Opportunities for All – Crossroads Community Hub Ltd | Approved |
Where a project is noted as ‘deferred’ this means that a final decision by the LAG is pending.
The application for The Community Regeneration of Millport Town Hall Ltd was rejected due to:
- The lack of fit with the project itself (not completion of the town hall) and ARIA fund priorities. The Local Action Group considered the application did not make a strong enough link between the project and completion of the town hall to validate the priorities selected.
- There was concern over the fire safety aspects at such a late stage in the overall project.
The application for the Arran Green Funding for Future (Arran Pioneer CIC) was rejected due to:
- A lack of project outcomes being fully determined or specified.
- The Local Action Group questioned the eligibility of the project under the guidance requirement for technical/feasibility studies to fully determine the project outcome.
- Asked by: Maurice Golden, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 06 December 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenny Gilruth on 23 December 2022
To ask the Scottish Government how many road accidents, where a defective/poor road surface was recorded as a contributory factor, there have been in each of the last five years, broken down by local authority area.
Answer
In response to your query, my officials have provided the data below as requested.
The following table shows the number of accidents where a defective or poor road surface was a contributory factor.
Council | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 |
Aberdeen City | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Aberdeenshire | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Angus | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
Argyll & Bute | 5 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
Clackmannanshire | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Dumfries & Galloway | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 |
Dundee City | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
East Ayrshire | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
East Dunbartonshire | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
East Lothian | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
East Renfrewshire | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Edinburgh, City of | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
Falkirk | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Fife | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
Glasgow City | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
Highland | 7 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
Midlothian | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Moray | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
North Ayrshire | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
North Lanarkshire | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Perth & Kinross | 0 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
Renfrewshire | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
Scottish Borders | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 3 |
Shetland Islands | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
South Ayrshire | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
South Lanarkshire | 4 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 1 |
Stirling | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
West Dunbartonshire | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
West Lothian | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
Total | 49 | 50 | 38 | 23 | 34 |
The data in the table above is collected as part of the wider collation of data on road casualties, which informs our road safety publications. Statistical data on road casualties are reported annually by Transport Scotland in two publications, Key Reported Road Casualties in the Spring of each year, and Reported Road Casualties Scotland, in the Autumn of each year. Provisional figures for 2022 are not available yet.
- Asked by: Jamie Greene, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 15 December 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Keith Brown on 23 December 2022
To ask the Scottish Government, in relation to deaths in custody determined to be suicides, in how many instances were (a) non-prescription and (b) illegal drugs found or suspected to be present in the deceased, including in cases where this was detected following a toxicology report, in each year since 2016.
Answer
The Scottish Prison Service publish information regarding all deaths in SPS custody on a quarterly basis, which includes the ‘medical certificate of cause of death’ (MCCD). However, data is not held by either the Scottish Government or the Scottish Prison Service on the number of instances of deaths in prison custody determined to be suicides involved non-prescription or illegal drugs found or suspected to be present in the deceased.
Steps are being taken through the implementation of the recommendations of the Independent Review of the Response to Deaths in Prison Custody to improve availability of data relating to deaths in prison custody.
- Asked by: Kaukab Stewart, MSP for Glasgow Kelvin, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 14 December 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ivan McKee on 22 December 2022
To ask the Scottish Government what it is doing to increase the availability of highspeed broadband in the Glasgow Kelvin constituency.
Answer
Superfast broadband coverage in Glasgow currently stands at 98.7% - in large part, thanks to commercial coverage, which also serves as a key strand of our Reaching 100% programme, particularly in extending coverage in Scotland’s urban areas.
However, our R100 Scottish Broadband Voucher Scheme remains available for those who are not expected to receive superfast broadband through either the R100 contracts or commercial build, offering a voucher worth up to £5,000 per property to secure a connection.
- Asked by: Oliver Mundell, MSP for Dumfriesshire, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 20 December 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 22 December 2022
To ask the Scottish Government what action it is taking to ensure that additional support needs are being met and that specialist educational support is available in Gaelic-medium schools.
Answer
All children and young people should receive the support they need to reach their full potential.
Education authorities are legally responsible for identifying and meeting the additional support needs of their pupils, including any additional support needs of pupils receiving Gaelic-medium education. The Scottish Government has supported education authorities in the delivery of these duties through the preparation and publication of statutory guidance.
We are also working closely with local government partners, through the Additional Support for Learning Project Board , to ensure we continue to see progress with the delivery of the recommendations from the 2020 additional support for learning review. In November 2022, we published an updated action plan and progress report to further support improvement in the implementation of additional support for learning, including within Gaelic-medium education.