- Asked by: Colin Smyth, MSP for South Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 09 December 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi McAllan on 5 January 2023
To ask the Scottish Government what recent discussions it has had with SEPA regarding any increased risk to bathing waters being below sufficient classifications for swimming in, during winter weather.
Answer
The Bathing Waters (Scotland) Regulations 2008 aims to minimise the risks to public health at designated locations and during periods when a large number of people bathe. However, it remains the personal responsibility of every individual to assess the risks before entering open water, whether at a designated bathing water within the bathing season or otherwise.
The globally accepted advice is to leave at least 48 hours after heavy rain before bathing whether within or outwith the bathing season. Further general advice on the health risks of open water swimming, which is also applicable to Scotland, is available from the UK Health Security Agency at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/swim-healthy-leaflet/swim-healthy .
The Scottish Government continuously works with SEPA, Scottish Water and other stakeholders on bathing water designations and to protect and improve bathing waters classifications. This has led to the number of bathing waters increasing since last year to 87, with 98% achieving the bathing water quality standards and more rated excellent than ever before.
- Asked by: Alexander Burnett, MSP for Aberdeenshire West, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 09 December 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Kevin Stewart on 5 January 2023
To ask the Scottish Government what consideration it has given to introducing a similar registration service to the “Use a lasting power of attorney” service introduced by the UK Government, in order to make it easier for attorneys and donors to share details with organisations.
Answer
The Scottish Government has not given consideration to a registration service in Scotland as this is an operational matter for Scottish Courts and Tribunal Service (SCTS). The question relates to functions that are the responsibility of the SCTS of which the Office of the Public Guardian in Scotland (OPG) is a part. The SCTS is an independent body corporate and as such it is not directly answerable to the Scottish Government. Instead, it is directly answerable to its board, chaired by the Lord President.
Mr. Burnett has asked a separate question (S6W-13059) relating to the backlog of power of attorney applications at the OPG since September last year and what support is being offered to the OPG by Scottish Government. SCTS has put a dedicated taskforce in place to reduce the time taken to process Power of Attorney applications and work has begun to introduce a new case management system. This question is being answered by the Cabinet Secretary for Justice and Veterans.
- Asked by: Jamie Greene, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 20 December 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Kevin Stewart on 5 January 2023
To ask the Scottish Government how much public money has been given to suicide bereavement support services, such as Survivors of Bereavement by Suicide and Papyrus UK, in each of the last five years.
Answer
The Scottish Government recognises the importance of providing compassionate, person-centred support for people who have been bereaved by suicide. This is reflected in the Scottish Government and COSLA’s new suicide prevention strategy and action plan, Creating Hope Together, which published in September. The strategy is supported by the Programme for Government commitment to double funding for suicide prevention to £2.8m per annum by the end of this Parliamentary term.
The new action plan includes a commitment to roll out bereavement support across Scotland, drawing on the evaluation of the current Suicide Bereavement Support Service pilot. The Scottish Government funds this pilot in two Health Board areas; Penumbra leads delivery of the pilot in Ayrshire and Arran and Change Mental Health (formerly Support in Mind Scotland) leads delivery in Highland. The total cost of the pilot service is £255,000 per annum, and this funding, split between the two organisations, has been allocated in 2021-22 and 2022-23.
Additionally, we have allocated Cruse Scotland a total of £16,780 for 2021-22 and £33,560 in 2022-23 to provide bereavement support in workplaces which have been affected by the suicide of a colleague.
- Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 14 December 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi McAllan on 5 January 2023
To ask the Scottish Government what consideration it has given to expanding the UV treatment of sewage to outside of bathing seasons.
Answer
The Bathing Waters (Scotland) Regulations 2008 (“the Regulations”) aims to minimise the risks to public health at designated locations and during periods when large numbers of people bathe. For all 87 designated bathing waters in Scotland the bathing season runs from 1 June to 15 September each year, in accordance with the traditional period of peak usage. In comparison with the 3 ½ month bathing season in Scotland, across Europe the season length varies from 2 months in Sweden to 6 months in Cypress.
The Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA) is responsible for ensuring that an appropriate level of water quality protection and improvement is provided for the designated bathing waters within the bathing season and outwith for nature and wildlife.
Scottish Water currently has UV treatment at nine Waste Water Treatment Works (WwTW) to meet microbiological standards during the bathing season as set out in its discharge authorisations issued by SEPA.
Maintaining the UV treatment at these WwTWs for the whole year would increase the use of energy and resources incurring financial and carbon costs at a time when these waters are not regularly used by large numbers of bathers. In line with the Bathing Waters Directive, the Regulations ensure that bathing water standards in Scotland are applied using a proportionate approach.
The number of bathing waters in Scotland has increased since last year and now stands at 87, with 98% achieving the bathing water quality standards and more rated excellent than ever before.
- Asked by: Alexander Stewart, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 19 December 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tom Arthur on 5 January 2023
To ask the Scottish Government how many properties will be subject to the higher property rate poundage in 2023-24, broken down by (a) industry sector and (b) local authority area.
Answer
The number of properties expected to be liable for the Higher Property Rate (HPR) in 2023-24 before any reliefs are applied is presented in the below tables, broken down in Table 1 by property class, and in Table 2 by local authority. Property class is a classification used by Scottish Assessors to describe the type of property, and does not necessarily accurately reflect the use of a property. The Scottish Government does not hold property-level data on industry sectors.
These tables are based on an imputed Valuation Roll based on an incomplete draft Valuation Roll, as used by the Scottish Fiscal Commission in Scotland’s Economic and Fiscal Forecasts December 2022, and figures are therefore subject to change.
Figures in these tables are rounded to the nearest 10, with values greater than zero but lower than five displayed as ‘[low]’.
Table 1: Number of properties liable for HPR in 2023-24 by property class
Property class | Properties with a gross HPR liability |
Shops | 2,390 |
Public Houses | 180 |
Offices | 1,760 |
Hotels | 580 |
Industrial Subjects | 2,520 |
Leisure, Entertainment, Caravans etc. | 510 |
Garages and Petrol Stations | 150 |
Cultural | 90 |
Sporting Subjects | 20 |
Education and Training | 1,390 |
Public Service Subjects | 500 |
Communications | 90 |
Quarries, Mines, etc. | 40 |
Petrochemical | 70 |
Religious | 40 |
Health and Medical | 280 |
Other | 240 |
Care Facilities | 350 |
Advertising | 10 |
Statutory Undertaking | 370 |
Not in use | 0 |
All | 11,570 |
Table 2: Number of properties liable for HPR in 2023-24 by local authority
Local authority | Properties with a gross HPR liability |
Aberdeen City | 1,040 |
Aberdeenshire | 530 |
Angus | 140 |
Argyll & Bute | 150 |
Clackmannanshire | 50 |
Dumfries & Galloway | 200 |
Dundee City | 350 |
East Ayrshire | 140 |
East Dunbartonshire | 110 |
East Lothian | 140 |
East Renfrewshire | 80 |
City of Edinburgh | 1,720 |
Na h-Eileanan Siar | 50 |
Falkirk | 290 |
Fife | 510 |
Glasgow City | 1,830 |
Highland | 600 |
Inverclyde | 110 |
Midlothian | 170 |
Moray | 200 |
North Ayrshire | 170 |
North Lanarkshire | 570 |
Orkney Islands | 30 |
Perth & Kinross | 280 |
Renfrewshire | 380 |
Scottish Borders | 170 |
Shetland Islands | 60 |
South Ayrshire | 200 |
South Lanarkshire | 540 |
Stirling | 210 |
West Dunbartonshire | 130 |
West Lothian | 420 |
Scotland | 11,570 |
- Asked by: Alexander Stewart, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 19 December 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tom Arthur on 5 January 2023
To ask the Scottish Government how many properties in 2023-24 will be subject to the intermediate property rate, broken down by (a) industry sector and (b) local authority area.
Answer
The number of properties expected to be liable for the Intermediate Property Rate (IPR) in 2023-24 before any reliefs are applied is presented in the below tables, broken down in Table 1 by property class, and in Table 2 by local authority. Property class is a classification used by Scottish Assessors to describe the type of property, and does not necessarily accurately reflect the use of a property. The Scottish Government does not hold property-level data on industry sectors.
These tables are based on an imputed Valuation Roll based on an incomplete draft Valuation Roll, as used by the Scottish Fiscal Commission in Scotland’s Economic and Fiscal Forecasts December 2022, and figures are therefore subject to change.
Figures in these tables are rounded to the nearest 10, with values greater than zero but lower than five displayed as ‘[low]’.
Table 1: Number of properties liable for IPR in 2023-24 by property class
Property class | Properties with a gross IPR liability |
Shops | 2,120 |
Public Houses | 420 |
Offices | 1,800 |
Hotels | 370 |
Industrial Subjects | 2,380 |
Leisure, Entertainment, Caravans etc. | 470 |
Garages and Petrol Stations | 190 |
Cultural | 90 |
Sporting Subjects | 30 |
Education and Training | 730 |
Public Service Subjects | 500 |
Communications | 30 |
Quarries, Mines, etc. | 50 |
Petrochemical | 10 |
Religious | 90 |
Health and Medical | 260 |
Other | 190 |
Care Facilities | 510 |
Advertising | 20 |
Statutory Undertaking | 150 |
Not in Use | 0 |
All | 10,400 |
Table 2: Number of properties liable for IPR in 2023-24 by local authority
Local authority | Properties with a gross IPR liability |
Aberdeen City | 830 |
Aberdeenshire | 450 |
Angus | 120 |
Argyll & Bute | 140 |
Clackmannanshire | 60 |
Dumfries & Galloway | 220 |
Dundee City | 320 |
East Ayrshire | 160 |
East Dunbartonshire | 110 |
East Lothian | 140 |
East Renfrewshire | 60 |
City of Edinburgh | 1,510 |
Na h-Eileanan Siar | 50 |
Falkirk | 200 |
Fife | 540 |
Glasgow City | 1,660 |
Highland | 590 |
Inverclyde | 80 |
Midlothian | 170 |
Moray | 150 |
North Ayrshire | 170 |
North Lanarkshire | 500 |
Orkney Islands | 40 |
Perth & Kinross | 270 |
Renfrewshire | 320 |
Scottish Borders | 180 |
Shetland Islands | 60 |
South Ayrshire | 170 |
South Lanarkshire | 430 |
Stirling | 190 |
West Dunbartonshire | 120 |
West Lothian | 390 |
Scotland | 10,400 |
- Asked by: Neil Bibby, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 09 December 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi Gougeon on 23 December 2022
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6W-12031 by Mairi Gougeon on 17 November 2022, which 16 organisations that applied to the Ayrshire Rural and Islands Ambition (ARIA) Fund progressed from the technical check stage to the assessment stage; which organisation failed the technical check process, and what the technical check was that it failed.
Answer
The outcome of the technical checks is detailed in the following table:
Project/Organisation | Decision |
Carbon Reduction – Adventure Centre for Education | Approved |
Dunlop Dairy Cheese Shop & Tasting Room | Deferred |
Disabled access plus Disabled Toilet and Additional Toilet – Hareshaw Community Hall SCIO | Approved |
Renewable Energy Infrastructure to New Tourist Accommodation Development – Millport, Jack Alt Stays | Approved |
Little Peru Green Start, Little Peru Ltd | Deferred |
The Community Regeneration of Millport Town Hall Ltd | Rejected |
Arran Green Funding for Future – Arran Pioneer CIC | Rejected |
Gaiety on Tour – Ayr Gaiety Partnership | Approved |
The Geisland Project – Beith CDT | Approved |
Access to Community for All – Crossroads Community Hubs Ltd | Approved |
Ailsa Craig Visitor Centre for Feasibility Study – Girvan Town Team (on behalf of Girvan Community Led Tourism) | Approved |
Brand Ambassador/Distillery Production Assistant – Isle of Cumbrae Distiller | Approved |
Paths Network Feasibility Study – Kirkimichael Village Renaissance | Deferred |
Newmilns Regeneration Feasibility Study – Newmilns Regeneration Association | Deferred |
Business Sustainability and Resilience Advisor – Visit Arran Ltd | Approved |
Opportunities for All – Crossroads Community Hub Ltd | Approved |
Where a project is noted as ‘deferred’ this means that a final decision by the LAG is pending.
The application for The Community Regeneration of Millport Town Hall Ltd was rejected due to:
- The lack of fit with the project itself (not completion of the town hall) and ARIA fund priorities. The Local Action Group considered the application did not make a strong enough link between the project and completion of the town hall to validate the priorities selected.
- There was concern over the fire safety aspects at such a late stage in the overall project.
The application for the Arran Green Funding for Future (Arran Pioneer CIC) was rejected due to:
- A lack of project outcomes being fully determined or specified.
- The Local Action Group questioned the eligibility of the project under the guidance requirement for technical/feasibility studies to fully determine the project outcome.
- Asked by: Maurice Golden, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 06 December 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenny Gilruth on 23 December 2022
To ask the Scottish Government how many road accidents, where a defective/poor road surface was recorded as a contributory factor, there have been in each of the last five years, broken down by local authority area.
Answer
In response to your query, my officials have provided the data below as requested.
The following table shows the number of accidents where a defective or poor road surface was a contributory factor.
Council | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 |
Aberdeen City | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Aberdeenshire | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Angus | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
Argyll & Bute | 5 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
Clackmannanshire | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Dumfries & Galloway | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 |
Dundee City | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
East Ayrshire | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
East Dunbartonshire | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
East Lothian | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
East Renfrewshire | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Edinburgh, City of | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
Falkirk | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Fife | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
Glasgow City | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
Highland | 7 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
Midlothian | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Moray | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
North Ayrshire | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
North Lanarkshire | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Perth & Kinross | 0 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
Renfrewshire | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
Scottish Borders | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 3 |
Shetland Islands | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
South Ayrshire | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
South Lanarkshire | 4 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 1 |
Stirling | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
West Dunbartonshire | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
West Lothian | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
Total | 49 | 50 | 38 | 23 | 34 |
The data in the table above is collected as part of the wider collation of data on road casualties, which informs our road safety publications. Statistical data on road casualties are reported annually by Transport Scotland in two publications, Key Reported Road Casualties in the Spring of each year, and Reported Road Casualties Scotland, in the Autumn of each year. Provisional figures for 2022 are not available yet.
- Asked by: Ariane Burgess, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 12 December 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi Gougeon on 23 December 2022
To ask the Scottish Government whether a fish farm company application for a European Protected Species Licence to use Acoustic Deterrent Devices (ADDs) or Acoustic Startle Devices (ASDs) would be refused unless the applicant has provided strong and robust evidence that all alternatives such as fitment of double skinned anti-predator nets, recirculating aquaculture systems, semi-closed containment and/or relocation of the farm have been tried.
Answer
A licence to disturb European protected species (“EPS”) can only be granted if three licensing tests are met, including that there is no satisfactory alternative to the proposed action.
Marine Scotland has published a document that provides guidance and advice for any aquaculture production business that wishes to apply for a licence to disturb EPS as a result of ADD use –
faq_adds_and_eps_including_annex_1_and_annex_2_-_version_5_-october_2021_-_final.pdf (marine.gov.scot) . Applicants are required to provide an analysis of alternative methods of predator control tried or considered and if they have been discounted provide reasons for this. All EPS licence applications are considered on a cases by case basis and it would not be appropriate to pre-determine the outcome of the satisfactory alternative test without consideration of any justification provided by the applicant.
- Asked by: Ariane Burgess, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 12 December 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi Gougeon on 23 December 2022
To ask the Scottish Government, when considering European Protected Species Licence applications, whether it will reject calculations to determine how many cetaceans would be disturbed or injured by an Acoustic Deterrent Device (ADD) if those calculations are based on an incorrect assumption that cetaceans are evenly spread over a large sea area and do not travel in pods or favour certain areas.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S6W-13105 on 23 December 2022. All answers to written Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at https://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/written-questions-and-answers