Skip to main content
Loading…
Chamber and committees

Education Governance Next Steps: Amendment 2

  • Submitted by: Tavish Scott, Shetland Islands, Scottish Liberal Democrats
  • Date lodged: Tuesday, 27 June 2017
  • Motion type: Amendment
  • Motion reference: S5M-06376.2
  • Current status: Taken in the Chamber on Wednesday, 28 June 2017

As an amendment to motion S5M-06376 in the name of John Swinney (Education Governance Next Steps), insert at end “; opposes compulsory top-down regional collaboration and the shifting of further control towards Scottish ministers; recalls the evidence presented to the Education and Skills Committee in favour of separating the policy and inspection functions of Education Scotland and believes that this is necessary, and notes the essential role of support services for schools, notably youth workers.”


Related motion

Education Governance Next Steps

Submitted by: John Swinney, Perthshire North, Scottish National Party

Date lodged: Monday, June 26, 2017

Motion reference: S5M-06376

Current status: Taken in the Chamber on Wednesday, June 28, 2017

Supported by: Mark McDonald, Shirley-Anne Somerville

Result 96 for, 27 against, 0 abstained, 6 did not vote Agreed


Amendments

Education Governance Next Steps: Amendment 1

Submitted by: Liz Smith, Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party

Date lodged: Tuesday, June 27, 2017

Motion reference: S5M-06376.1

Current status: Taken in the Chamber on Wednesday, June 28, 2017

Supported by: Bill Bowman

Result 31 for, 92 against, 0 abstained, 6 did not vote Disagreed


Education Governance Next Steps: Amendment 3

Submitted by: Ross Greer, West Scotland, Scottish Green Party

Date lodged: Tuesday, June 27, 2017

Motion reference: S5M-06376.3

Current status: Taken in the Chamber on Wednesday, June 28, 2017

Result 30 for, 92 against, 0 abstained, 7 did not vote Disagreed


Education Governance Next Steps: Amendment 4

Submitted by: Iain Gray, East Lothian, Scottish Labour

Date lodged: Tuesday, June 27, 2017

Motion reference: S5M-06376.4

Current status: Taken in the Chamber on Wednesday, June 28, 2017

Result 30 for, 93 against, 0 abstained, 6 did not vote Disagreed