- Asked by: Alex Cole-Hamilton, MSP for Edinburgh Western, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Friday, 14 March 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenni Minto on 21 March 2025
To ask the Scottish Government whether it has any plans to reform the process for exhumation applications for ashes, in light of reports that the new system has moved away from independent crematory management, which was inexpensive, and now requires families to go through solicitors, which can reportedly cost more that £5,000.
Answer
The current procedure for applications for exhumation has been in place for many years. It involves the engagement of a solicitor who will apply to the sheriff court for a warrant to disinter. The process can be lengthy, complex and incur significant cost.
The Scottish Government is developing regulations on exhumation which will remove applications from the sheriff court, making the process more straightforward and less expensive for applicants.
- Asked by: Alexander Burnett, MSP for Aberdeenshire West, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 14 March 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Siobhian Brown on 21 March 2025
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will investigate the recent fire at the battery energy storage system site at Rothienorman in Aberdeenshire.
Answer
It is the role of the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service (SFRS) to investigate fires. SFRS attended a 9-tonne lithium-ion phosphate battery fire at Rothienorman, Aberdeenshire on 21 February 2025. It had been damaged in transit and was not installed. The fire was extinguished, and crews left the scene at approximately 6.40pm. There were no casualties
- Asked by: Tim Eagle, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 14 March 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ivan McKee on 21 March 2025
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6W-35132 by Ivan McKee on 27 February 2025, for what reason it only carried out a partial island communities impact assessment (ICIA), instead of a full ICIA, for the Visitor Levy (Scotland) Bill prior to the Parliament's consideration of the Bill at stage 1, in light of the assessment in the partial ICIA published in May 2023, which noted that "the geographical remoteness of islands can generate a number of particular challenges".
Answer
Further to the explanation in the ICIA, the basis of the charge being a percentage, it would not be expected to have a significantly different effect on island based tourism businesses to those based on the mainland, Nevertheless, the ICIA does include observations and concerns around issues including the prevalence of smaller hospitality businesses on islands, the high numbers of day visitors, the existing costs of transport to islands, and that islands and island residents have a particular reliance on using overnight accommodation when people travel to and from the mainland because of the need to build in consideration for potential ferry disruption.
I would add that, local authorities have an obligation to comply with their duties under the Islands (Scotland) Act 2018. Additionally, local authorities have the power to charge different rates and exemptions for different geographical areas. Each local authority has a responsibility to publish an assessment of the impacts of introducing a Visitor Levy, including for the different rates and exemptions they may choose to apply. Local authorities also have a statutory requirement to consult with local communities, businesses, and the public, prior to the introduction of a Visitor Levy. You may wish to respond to any consultation in your local area in relation to how they might introduce a scheme.
- Asked by: Stephen Kerr, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 12 March 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Paul McLennan on 21 March 2025
To ask the Scottish Government what assessment it has made of the causes behind the reported increase in homes falling below the tolerable standard since 2018.
Answer
The cause behind the reported increase in homes falling below the tolerable standard since 2018 is due to the introduction of the fire and smoke alarm, and carbon monoxide criteria in 2022.
The legal duty to take action on houses that do not meet the tolerable standard rests with the local authority. No homeowner will be criminalised if they need more time, and there are no penalties for non-compliance.
- Asked by: Craig Hoy, MSP for South Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 07 March 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 21 March 2025
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6W-34603 by Shona Robison on 26 February 2025, whether all of its assessments of the long-term impacts of behavioural responses to its income tax policies pertain to measurements of past and present impacts, and not to future, projected impacts.
Answer
Scottish Fiscal Commission forecasts for income tax include judgements for behavioural responses which are based on evidence from academic literature on how taxpayers have responded to previous changes to income tax policy in Scotland, the UK, and internationally. The SFC applies behavioural responses to policies over the course of their full forecast. More detailed information is available at the following link: How we forecast behavioural responses to income tax policy | Scottish Fiscal Commission.
- Asked by: Karen Adam, MSP for Banffshire and Buchan Coast, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 12 March 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Fairlie on 20 March 2025
To ask the Scottish Government what its response is to Aberdeenshire Council’s decision to remove the nightwatch service at Macduff Harbour, in light of reported concerns about the economic impact of the decision.
Answer
We recognise the importance of this issue to harbour users; however, ports in Scotland are mostly independent statutory bodies – each governed by their own local legislation – and are deemed commercial entities. Therefore, the Scottish Government has no say in the day-to-day running of their business, nor can it dictate business decisions made by a company on how to best utilise its resources. These are matters for the port authority.
- Asked by: Paul Sweeney, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 11 March 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Siobhian Brown on 20 March 2025
To ask the Scottish Government what its position is on the reported calls for the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service (SFRS) to maximise any potential revenue return from the development of its proposed new fire station at Stewart Street in Cowcaddens, Glasgow, by developing a revised design concept that enables the sale or lease of the air rights above the proposed station to a development partner for a high-density mixed use residential development, instead of an isolated low-amenity two-storey building, and whether it will request that the SFRS adopts this proposal.
Answer
To deliver maximum value to the public purse, it is appropriate for the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service (SFRS) to attempt to maximise the potential revenue return from any sale of excess assets. It is normal to seek outline planning consent in advance of any potential sale of land and SFRS is working with Glasgow City Council to achieve that.
The development of the proposed new fire station at Stewart Street is a matter for SFRS and Glasgow City Council.
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 11 March 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Angela Constance on 20 March 2025
To ask the Scottish Government how many times police have been called to incidents at (a) primary and (b) secondary schools in each year since 2004.
Answer
Information on the total number of times that police have been called to incidents in schools, both primary and secondary, is not held centrally.
- Asked by: Liam Kerr, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 12 March 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Angela Constance on 20 March 2025
To ask the Scottish Government on what date the projected cost of HMP Glasgow was revised to £998.4 million; when the Cabinet Secretary for Justice and Home Affairs was advised of this figure, and whether it expects this to be the final cost.
Answer
Following a period of negotiation with the contractor Kier on the construction contract price, the total project cost of £998.4 million was confirmed in November 2024.
I received regular updates on the pricing and commercial process of the HMP Glasgow construction contract from the Chief Executive of the Scottish Prison Service over the course of 2024. On 13 January 2025 Cabinet Secretary for Justice and Home Affairs received formal advice confirming the total project cost £998.4m.
The construction contract is fixed price and the total project cost includes contingency for risk.
- Asked by: Liam Kerr, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 12 March 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Angela Constance on 20 March 2025
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will publish the evidence that led the Cabinet Secretary for Justice and Home Affairs to change the previously held position to reduce jury numbers to 12 in the Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill.
Answer
The Policy Memorandum for the Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill set out the reasons the Scottish Government proposed to reduce jury size to 12. This included evidence from the independent Scottish Jury Research - gov.scot.
In its Stage 1 report the Criminal Justice Committee did not support the reduction in jury size. I therefore confirmed in my letter of 31 October 2024 to the Committee that, as I am satisfied that the abolition of not proven does not require an associated change to the jury size, I would bring forward amendments to retain a jury of 15, in line with the Committee’s position. I have tabled these ahead of the current Stage 2 scrutiny.