Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Questions and answers

Parliamentary questions can be asked by any MSP to the Scottish Government or the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. The questions provide a means for MSPs to get factual and statistical information.

  • Written questions must be answered within 10 working days (20 working days during recess)
  • Other questions such as Topical, Portfolio, General and First Minister's Question Times are taken in the Chamber

Urgent Questions aren't included in the Question and Answers search.  There is a SPICe fact sheet listing Urgent and emergency questions.

Find out more about parliamentary questions

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Session 6: 13 May 2021 to 8 April 2026
  7. Current session: 14 May 2026 to 7 November 2026
Answer status
Question type

Displaying 759 questions Show Answers

Order by |

Question reference: S4W-14794

  • Asked by: John Lamont, MSP for Ettrick, Roxburgh and Berwickshire, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
  • Date lodged: Thursday, 09 May 2013
  • Current Status: Answered by Kenny MacAskill on 23 May 2013

To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S4W-14146 by Kenny MacAskill on 2 May 2013, how many of those given a custodial sentence in 2011-12 of up to (a) three and (b) six months where the main offence had a domestic abuse aggravator were (i) male and (ii) female and how many cases involved a same-sex partner.

Question reference: S4W-14824

  • Asked by: John Lamont, MSP for Ettrick, Roxburgh and Berwickshire, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
  • Date lodged: Thursday, 09 May 2013
  • Current Status: Answered by Keith Brown on 23 May 2013

To ask the Scottish Government when the damage caused by the landslip on the A68 at Blainslie south of Lauder will be repaired.

Question reference: S4W-14791

  • Asked by: John Lamont, MSP for Ettrick, Roxburgh and Berwickshire, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
  • Date lodged: Thursday, 09 May 2013
  • Current Status: Answered by Kenny MacAskill on 23 May 2013

To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S4W-14147 by Kenny MacAskill on 2 May 2013, how many of those (a) accused and (b) convicted in 2011-12 where the main offence had a domestic abuse aggravator were (i) male and (ii) female and how many cases involved a same-sex partner, also broken down by disposal type.

Question reference: S4W-14603

  • Asked by: John Lamont, MSP for Ettrick, Roxburgh and Berwickshire, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
  • Date lodged: Wednesday, 01 May 2013
  • Current Status: Answered by John Swinney on 17 May 2013

To ask the Scottish Government, in the event of Scottish independence, whether it would guarantee benefits accrued after independence by pension schemes that are currently part of UK pension schemes and, if so, on what terms.

Question reference: S4W-14600

  • Asked by: John Lamont, MSP for Ettrick, Roxburgh and Berwickshire, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
  • Date lodged: Wednesday, 01 May 2013
  • Current Status: Answered by John Swinney on 17 May 2013

To ask the Scottish Government what pension scheme management companies it has consulted regarding the effect that Scottish independence would have on their funding arrangements in light of EU regulations requiring the full funding of cross-border pension schemes.

Question reference: S4W-14601

  • Asked by: John Lamont, MSP for Ettrick, Roxburgh and Berwickshire, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
  • Date lodged: Wednesday, 01 May 2013
  • Current Status: Answered by John Swinney on 17 May 2013

To ask the Scottish Government what discussions it has had with the UK Government regarding the cross-border management of pension schemes in the event of Scottish independence.

Question reference: S4W-14599

  • Asked by: John Lamont, MSP for Ettrick, Roxburgh and Berwickshire, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
  • Date lodged: Wednesday, 01 May 2013
  • Current Status: Answered by John Swinney on 17 May 2013

To ask the Scottish Government whether it can provide examples of “cross-border schemes with Ireland” as referred to by a Scottish Government spokesman in a report in the The Herald on 26 April 2013.

Question reference: S4W-14602

  • Asked by: John Lamont, MSP for Ettrick, Roxburgh and Berwickshire, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
  • Date lodged: Wednesday, 01 May 2013
  • Current Status: Answered by John Swinney on 17 May 2013

To ask the Scottish Government whether it plans to withdraw from the Pension Protection Fund (PPF) in the event of Scottish independence and, if so, whether it would negotiate a division of PPF levies accumulated since its establishment.

Question reference: S4W-14923

  • Asked by: John Lamont, MSP for Ettrick, Roxburgh and Berwickshire, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
  • Date lodged: Tuesday, 14 May 2013
  • Current Status: Answered by John Swinney on 16 May 2013

To ask the Scottish Government what its analysis is of the views of respondents outlined in paragraphs 2.6 to 2.11 of the UK Government publication, The Scotland Act 2012: summary of responses to the consultation on Scottish Government bond issuance, in relation to the rate at which an independent Scotland could borrow money.

Question reference: S4W-14402

  • Asked by: John Lamont, MSP for Ettrick, Roxburgh and Berwickshire, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
  • Date lodged: Tuesday, 23 April 2013
  • Current Status: Answered by Margaret Burgess on 8 May 2013

To ask the Scottish Government what its position is on the recommendations set out in the report, Review of the barriers to institutional investment in private rented homes, regarding (a) allowing local authorities flexibility in the planning system to plan for and enable developments of privately rented homes including waiving affordable housing requirements on new developments of homes specifically for private rent, (b) setting up a task force to encourage and support build-to-let investment from the private sector and to develop voluntary standards that future landlords would meet and tenants could expect and (c) allocating some of the redundant, formerly used public sector land and buildings for build-to-let development.