- Asked by: John Lamont, MSP for Ettrick, Roxburgh and Berwickshire, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 09 May 2013
-
Current Status:
Answered by Kenny MacAskill on 23 May 2013
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S4W-14146 by Kenny MacAskill on 2 May 2013, how many of those given a custodial sentence in 2011-12 of up to (a) three and (b) six months where the main offence had a domestic abuse aggravator were (i) male and (ii) female and how many cases involved a same-sex partner.
Answer
The data held on the Scottish Government Court Proceedings Database shows that there were 382 people (373 Male, 9 Female) given a custodial sentence of up to three months and 490 (483 Male, 7 Female) with a sentence of over three months to six months for cases where the main charge had a domestic abuse aggravator recorded in the financial year 2011-12.
Information on the relationships of the persons proceeded against for offences with a domestic abuse aggravator is not held centrally.
Source: Scottish Government Court Proceedings Database.
- Asked by: John Lamont, MSP for Ettrick, Roxburgh and Berwickshire, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 09 May 2013
-
Current Status:
Answered by Keith Brown on 23 May 2013
To ask the Scottish Government when the damage caused by the landslip on the A68 at Blainslie south of Lauder will be repaired.
Answer
The works contract for repairing the damage caused by the landslip on the A68 trunk road at Blainslie, South of Lauder, should be awarded by the end of May. Works should be completed during the summer.
- Asked by: John Lamont, MSP for Ettrick, Roxburgh and Berwickshire, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 09 May 2013
-
Current Status:
Answered by Kenny MacAskill on 23 May 2013
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S4W-14147 by Kenny MacAskill on 2 May 2013, how many of those (a) accused and (b) convicted in 2011-12 where the main offence had a domestic abuse aggravator were (i) male and (ii) female and how many cases involved a same-sex partner, also broken down by disposal type.
Answer
The following table provides the available information.
People proceeded against in Scottish courts for offences with a domestic abuse aggravator recorded by gender, 2011-12
| Result | Male | Female | Total |
| All proceeded against | 9,300 | 1,199 | 10,499 |
| Results of Convictions | | | |
| Custody | 1,079 | 25 | 1,104 |
| Community sentence | 2,082 | 171 | 2,253 |
| Monetary | 2,470 | 213 | 2,683 |
| Admonished | 2,229 | 510 | 2,739 |
| Absolute discharge | 45 | 32 | 77 |
| Other | 12 | 1 | 13 |
| Total Convicted | 7,917 | 952 | 8,869 |
Information on the relationships of the persons proceeded against for offences with a domestic abuse aggravator is not held centrally.
Source: Scottish Government Court Proceedings Database.
- Asked by: John Lamont, MSP for Ettrick, Roxburgh and Berwickshire, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 01 May 2013
-
Current Status:
Answered by John Swinney on 17 May 2013
To ask the Scottish Government, in the event of Scottish independence, whether it would guarantee benefits accrued after independence by pension schemes that are currently part of UK pension schemes and, if so, on what terms.
Answer
All pensions’ rights and entitlements which have been accrued will continue to be fully protected and accessible under independence, including private, public and state pensions. There is no rationale as to why in an independent Scotland the provision for and payment of private pensions would be otherwise.
- Asked by: John Lamont, MSP for Ettrick, Roxburgh and Berwickshire, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 01 May 2013
-
Current Status:
Answered by John Swinney on 17 May 2013
To ask the Scottish Government what pension scheme management companies it has consulted regarding the effect that Scottish independence would have on their funding arrangements in light of EU regulations requiring the full funding of cross-border pension schemes.
Answer
We are engaging with key participants from providers, trustees and employers on this and other issues of importance to business in the independence debate.
- Asked by: John Lamont, MSP for Ettrick, Roxburgh and Berwickshire, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 01 May 2013
-
Current Status:
Answered by John Swinney on 17 May 2013
To ask the Scottish Government what discussions it has had with the UK Government regarding the cross-border management of pension schemes in the event of Scottish independence.
Answer
The Scottish Government would welcome discussions with the UK Government on a range of issues relating to Scottish independence, including the operation of cross-border pension schemes.
- Asked by: John Lamont, MSP for Ettrick, Roxburgh and Berwickshire, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 01 May 2013
-
Current Status:
Answered by John Swinney on 17 May 2013
To ask the Scottish Government whether it can provide examples of “cross-border schemes with Ireland” as referred to by a Scottish Government spokesman in a report in the The Herald on 26 April 2013.
Answer
The ICAS report “Scotland’s Pensions Future: What Pensions Arrangements Would Scotland Need?”, on page 17 footnote 22, provides the example of the implementation of EU Directive 2003/41/EC (IORP) and the operation of cross-border pensions schemes between the UK and Ireland and states:
“Prior to the Pensions (IORP) Directive, employers with subsidiaries in other member states (other than those with subsidiaries in the Republic of Ireland which received a level of exclusion due to a reciprocal agreement between the UK and Ireland) were required to establish separate schemes in each member state in which a subsidiary was based. The Pensions (IORP) Directive enabled, for the first time, companies operating in a number of member states to consolidate their pension arrangements in one member state. During the consultation process for the UK’s implementing legislation, the impact of the Directive’s cross-border funding requirements on existing UK/Irish cross-border schemes was considered. The Commission refused to exclude existing cross-border schemes operating in the UK and the Republic of Ireland from the scope of the obligations under the Directive, though ultimately the UK implementing legislation provided for a three year grace period for existing cross-border schemes to reach full funding levels.”
- Asked by: John Lamont, MSP for Ettrick, Roxburgh and Berwickshire, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 01 May 2013
-
Current Status:
Answered by John Swinney on 17 May 2013
To ask the Scottish Government whether it plans to withdraw from the Pension Protection Fund (PPF) in the event of Scottish independence and, if so, whether it would negotiate a division of PPF levies accumulated since its establishment.
Answer
The current rights and entitlements under UK-wide schemes, such as the PPF which is funded by levies on the industry, will continue as will the protection that the Fund affords to current pension scheme members and pensioners in Scotland. It is a requirement of the EU Directive 2003/41/EC Institutions for Occupational Retirement Provision (IORP) (Article 17c) that each Member State must provide a guarantee fund equating to one third of the required solvency margin. An independent Scotland will continue to comply with this EU regulation.
- Asked by: John Lamont, MSP for Ettrick, Roxburgh and Berwickshire, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 14 May 2013
-
Current Status:
Answered by John Swinney on 16 May 2013
To ask the Scottish Government what its analysis is of the views of respondents outlined in paragraphs 2.6 to 2.11 of the UK Government publication, The Scotland Act 2012: summary of responses to the consultation on Scottish Government bond issuance, in relation to the rate at which an independent Scotland could borrow money.
Answer
We assume that the question relates to the publication by HM Treasury on 13 May 2013 of a summary of responses to its consultation on bond issuance by the Scottish Government, which closed approximately eight months ago. The Scottish Government believes that it should have powers to raise funding through issuing bonds if this is the appropriate choice in the circumstances. Of those respondents expressing a view more agreed with the Scottish Government’s position than disagreed. We see no reason for the UK Government to seek to prevent the Scottish Government borrowing through these means. Local authorities and a range of public bodies such as Transport for London have such powers at present.
- Asked by: John Lamont, MSP for Ettrick, Roxburgh and Berwickshire, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 23 April 2013
-
Current Status:
Answered by Margaret Burgess on 8 May 2013
To ask the Scottish Government what its position is on the recommendations set out in the report, Review of the barriers to institutional investment in private rented homes, regarding (a) allowing local authorities flexibility in the planning system to plan for and enable developments of privately rented homes including waiving affordable housing requirements on new developments of homes specifically for private rent, (b) setting up a task force to encourage and support build-to-let investment from the private sector and to develop voluntary standards that future landlords would meet and tenants could expect and (c) allocating some of the redundant, formerly used public sector land and buildings for build-to-let development.
Answer
Development of the new Strategy for the private rented sector in Scotland has been influenced by the content of Sir Adrian Montague’s report, Review of the Barriers to Institutional Investment in Private Rented Homes.
In implementing the actions within the forthcoming Strategy for the private rented sector, we will discuss with stakeholders the relevance of recommendations to the Scottish context and how any opportunities for growth might be realised.