- Asked by: Jackson Carlaw, MSP for Eastwood, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 03 November 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by Derek Mackay on 20 November 2017
To ask the Scottish Government what meetings it has had with the (a) directors and (b) staff of Momentous Change Ltd.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S5W-12447 on 20 November 2017. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament’s website, the search facility for which can be found at http://www.parliament.scot/parliamentarybusiness/28877.aspx.
- Asked by: Jackson Carlaw, MSP for Eastwood, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 03 November 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by Derek Mackay on 20 November 2017
To ask the Scottish Government whether Momentous Change Ltd (a) has been contracted and (b) is being considered to undertake any work for (i) it, (ii) its arms length bodies and (iii) any other organisations associated with it.
Answer
The Scottish Government has not awarded any contracts to Momentous Change Ltd and it is not aware of the company being considered for any of its work. The Scottish Government does not hold centrally records for contracts awarded by its arm’s length bodies and any other organisations associated with it.
The Scottish Government has no record of meetings with the directors or staff of Momentous Change Ltd (incorporated on 21 August 2017). It will, however, be the case that Scottish Government Ministers will have met with Roger Mullen or Michelle Thomson during their tenure as Members of the UK Parliament on issues unrelated to, and predating, the formation of Momentous Change Limited.
- Asked by: Jackson Carlaw, MSP for Eastwood, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 15 November 2017
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 23 November 2017
To ask the Scottish Government what further progress has been made with the implementation of the Alcohol (Minimum Pricing) (Scotland) Act 2012.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 23 November 2017
- Asked by: Jackson Carlaw, MSP for Eastwood, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 25 October 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 2 November 2017
To ask the Scottish Government what progress is being made with the implementation of the Alcohol (Minimum Pricing) (Scotland) Act 2012.
Answer
The court case on minimum unit pricing of alcohol was heard by the UK Supreme Court in July and we are currently awaiting the judgment.
Minimum unit pricing of alcohol was passed unopposed by this Chamber in 2012 and would have been in place now for over four years if it were not for the legal challenge led by the Scotch Whisky Association.
We are as frustrated as many others in the Chamber about the delays caused by the legal challenge. We remain fully committed to the implementation of minimum unit pricing and, if the Supreme Court judgment is the positive outcome we hope for, we will move as quickly as is practicable to put the policy in place. We firmly believe minimum unit pricing is legal and would be the most effective way to tackle alcohol misuse, as part of a package of measures and would bring significant health and social benefits.
- Asked by: Jackson Carlaw, MSP for Eastwood, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 04 September 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by Alasdair Allan on 12 September 2017
To ask the Scottish Government what safeguards it has in place to ensure that its international development funding to the Palestinian Authority is not used for the payment of so-called terror salaries or given to the families of so-called martyrs.
Answer
The Scottish Government does not provide any international development funding either directly to the Palestinian Authority or to Scottish NGOs working in Palestine. As a result there is no question that such funding is used for payment in the way the member describes.
- Asked by: Jackson Carlaw, MSP for Eastwood, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 04 September 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by Alasdair Allan on 11 September 2017
To ask the Scottish Government what analysis has been undertaken of its international development funding to the Palestinian Authority.
Answer
Since the inception of the Scottish Government's International Development Programme in 2005, at no time has funding been provided either directly to the Palestinian Authority or to Scottish NGOs to deliver international development projects on our behalf. As a result, no such analysis has been undertaken.
- Asked by: Jackson Carlaw, MSP for Eastwood, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 04 September 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by Alasdair Allan on 11 September 2017
To ask the Scottish Government how much international development funding it has given to the Palestinian Authority in each of the last five years, broken down by the (a) organisation funded and (b) objectives behind the funding.
Answer
During the last 5 years (2013-14 - 2017-18) the Scottish Government has not provided any international development funding either directly to the Palestinian Authority or to Scottish NGOs to deliver projects on our behalf.
- Asked by: Jackson Carlaw, MSP for Eastwood, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 09 August 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 1 September 2017
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will provide details of discussions that it has had with the Irish Government regarding the possible co-funding of the drug, Orkambi, for the treatment of cystic fibrosis, and what progress the NHS has made regarding establishing a so-called pipeline deal with the drug's manufacturer.
Answer
The deal between Ireland’s Health Service Executive (HSE) and Vertex Pharmaceuticals is commercially confidential.
I wrote to Vertex Pharmaceuticals in March to encourage them to take forward discussions about the cost of Orkambi with colleagues in NHS National Services Scotland who are best placed to advise them on pricing approaches and a fair price that could support the securing of a positive recommendation from the Scottish Medicines Consortium for the prescribing of these products in NHS Scotland. Those talks are underway.
Through those discussions we hope that the manufacturer will make their best offer on price and indicate that they will re-submit an application for Orkambi to the SMC.
- Asked by: Jackson Carlaw, MSP for Eastwood, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 30 August 2017
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 6 September 2017
To ask the Scottish Government what the impact has been of the Capital Acceleration Programme.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 6 September 2017
- Asked by: Jackson Carlaw, MSP for Eastwood, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 04 August 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by Humza Yousaf on 23 August 2017
To ask the Scottish Government what consideration it has given to the impact of the judgments in ParkingEye v Beavis [2015] UKSC 67 and Vehicle Control Services Ltd v Mackie [2017] SC DUN 24 on the (a) contractual enforcement and (b) standing of private parking schemes.
Answer
We are aware that improvements could be made to various aspects of the private parking schemes, and for this reason, we have set up a Stakeholder Working Group with representatives from the private parking industry, Trading Standards Scotland and Citizens Advice Scotland to explore how we can deliver improvements to the practices of private parking operators in Scotland.
As part of this work, we have been exploring how we can deliver a fairer, more transparent and consistent approach to parking enforcement practices and to the appeals process in Scotland through the development of a single Code of Practice that the industry would voluntarily sign up to. In addition, a Private Member's Bill entitled Parking (Code of Practice) Bill was introduced in the UK Parliament on 19 July 2017.
The Private Member's Bill also seeks to create a fairer and more transparent sector through regulation via the development of a single Code of Practice. We are therefore exploring this issue with our UK counterparts to determine what this would mean for Scotland. We will continue to work with our stakeholders to ensure that we have a fair and transparent sector, in which motorists understand their rights and responsibilities for parking on private land.