-
Current Status:
Withdrawn
- Asked by: Lewis Macdonald, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 18 October 2011
-
Current Status:
Answered by Kenny MacAskill on 31 October 2011
To ask the Scottish Executive for what reason it carried out a business and regulatory impact assessment for the (a) Double Jeopardy (Scotland) Bill and (b) Forced Marriage etc. (Protection and Jurisdiction) (Scotland) Bill.
Answer
A business and regulatory impact assessment was completed for the Double Jeopardy (Scotland) Bill as the bill contained provisions which would potentially have some impact on the legal aid budget and businesses operating in this area of the law.
A business and regulatory impact assessment was completed for the Forced Marriage etc (Protection and Jurisdiction) (Scotland) Bill as the bill contained provisions that potentially had an impact on third sector and public sector organisations.
- Asked by: Lewis Macdonald, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 18 October 2011
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fergus Ewing on 28 October 2011
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it considers that a business and regulatory impact assessment should be carried out whenever a government proposal might impose additional costs on businesses.
Answer
It is not always necessary to complete business and regulatory impact assessments. Decisions on whether or not a BRIA is prepared rest with the appropriate portfolio minister or Cabinet Secretary.
- Asked by: Lewis Macdonald, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 18 October 2011
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fergus Ewing on 28 October 2011
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it considers that, except when a policy change does not lead to a cost or saving for business, third or public sector organisations, regulators or consumers, it is always necessary to carry out a business and regulatory impact assessment.
Answer
No. In his letter of 10 March 2010 to the Convener of the Finance Committee, the Cabinet Secretary for Finance and Sustainable Growth stated that a mandatory approach to business and regulatory impact assessments “would inevitably place an additional and disproportionate consultation burden on business, potentially diverting their focus from commercial imperatives”.
- Asked by: Lewis Macdonald, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 05 October 2011
-
Current Status:
Answered by Keith Brown on 27 October 2011
To ask the Scottish Executive when it planned to place the required notice for the Borders Railway project in the Official Journal of the European Union under the project's previous procurement model, and when it now plans to do so.
Answer
The required notice for the Borders Railway project was placed in the Official Journal of the European Union (OJEU) in December 2009. A Notice of Discontinuance was placed in the OJEU in October 2011.
- Asked by: Lewis Macdonald, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 18 October 2011
-
Current Status:
Answered by John Swinney on 27 October 2011
To ask the Scottish Executive how much the average business will have to pay as a result of the proposed public health levy in 2012-13.
Answer
The Public Health Supplement will apply only to large retail properties with a rateable value of over £300,000 which sells both tobacco and alcohol. Further detail will be available when legislation is laid in the new year.
- Asked by: Lewis Macdonald, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 18 October 2011
-
Current Status:
Answered by John Swinney on 27 October 2011
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it considers that the publication of a business and regulatory impact assessment on its proposed public health levy would highlight the extent to which the levy might impact on business and competitiveness.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S4W-03473 on 27 October 2011. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the parliament’s website, the search facility for which can be found at:
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/parliamentarybusiness/28877.aspx.
- Asked by: Lewis Macdonald, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 18 October 2011
-
Current Status:
Answered by John Swinney on 27 October 2011
To ask the Scottish Executive what assessment it has made of the (a) costs, (b) benefits and (c) associated risks of its proposed public health levy on (i) businesses, (ii) consumers and (iii) local authorities.
Answer
The Scottish Government cannot afford to ignore the scale of social problems that put pressure on the public purse. The total combined economic cost to Scotland of tobacco and alcohol misuse is estimated to be £4.7 billion each year.
By introducing the public health supplement we are providing a new funding stream estimated to generate an additional £110 million over the three year Spending Review period. This will be used to contribute towards the preventative spend measures that will be taken forward jointly with the Scottish Government, local authorities, the NHS and the third sector.
The legislation for the supplement will be subject to full and appropriate parliamentary scrutiny.
- Asked by: Lewis Macdonald, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 18 October 2011
-
Current Status:
Answered by John Swinney on 27 October 2011
To ask the Scottish Executive for what reason it did not consult on its proposed public health levy before making it part of the 2012-13 draft budget.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S4W-03473 on 27 October 2011. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the parliament’s website, the search facility for which can be found at:
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/parliamentarybusiness/28877.aspx.
- Asked by: Lewis Macdonald, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 05 October 2011
-
Current Status:
Answered by Keith Brown on 27 October 2011
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S4W-02836 by Keith Brown on 29 September 2011, what preliminary works are scheduled for the Borders Railway project and when these are expected to be completed.
Answer
The package of advance utility diversion works which commenced in March 2010 is nearing completion. Transport Scotland is currently in discussions with Network Rail regarding additional preliminary works which may be required in advance of main construction works.