- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 18 January 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Susan Deacon on 5 March 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will order an inquiry into the circumstances of how parts of a calf whose mother was infected by BSE may have found their way into the human food chain and, if so, who will be involved in this inquiry.
Answer
Where possible animals identified as offspring of BSE cases are traced and removed from the human food chain. Officials of the Food Standards Agency, the Scottish Executive and the Ministry of Agriculture are jointly considering whether, in this particular case, the offspring could have been removed at an earlier stage.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 09 November 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Susan Deacon on 5 March 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive what the precise objections of the Health Department's Reference Laboratory Group were to the evidence it received regarding the proposed method of tiered testing of scallops and the public health implications of such a method, what further work is necessary on this evidence, by what date this work must be completed and whether this work will be made publicly available.
Answer
The Food Standards Agency has advised me that the EU ASP Working Group requested further information on the variation of toxin levels in individual parts of the scallop. A second, more detailed scientific report addressing this issue has been prepared and will be scrutinised by the working group in early April. The reports were prepared for the EU Working Group and they will decide on the circulation.Additionally work is being progressed by the Agency to ensure a rigorous enforcement regime, and an adequate monitoring programme can be developed which will guarantee consumer safety should a tiered approach be acceptable in scientific terms.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 15 February 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sarah Boyack on 1 March 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-12954 by Sarah Boyack on 14 February 2001, whether it will arrange for immediate interim payments to be made to members of the Scottish Transport Group pension schemes.
Answer
No payments can be made to members of the Scottish Transport Group pension schemes before the Scottish Transport Group is wound up.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 15 February 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jack McConnell on 1 March 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive why it stated that the Minister for Rural Development attended a meeting of the Council of Ministers on 20 October 1999 when that meeting did not take place and what the explanation is for this discrepancy.
Answer
An Agriculture Council was scheduled for that week and it was thought that Mr Finnie would attend. The meeting was cancelled but because of an administrative oversight the information which had been entered on the department's database was not amended. Steps have now been taken to prevent similar errors occuring in the future. Information on ministerial attendance at EU meetings provided to the Parliament's Reference Centre has been amended.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 21 February 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tom McCabe on 1 March 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive what discussions it has had with Her Majesty's Government regarding the impact of section 57(2) of the Scotland Act on devolved matters.
Answer
We are in regular contact with the UK Government on a range of issues.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 14 February 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 28 February 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive why the public are only required to be notified of proposed GM crop trial sites rather than having a statutory right to be consulted.
Answer
Neither the governing European Directive 90/220/EEC nor the Environmental Protection Act 1990 require or provide a basis for consultation on any aspect of a proposed release.The recently adopted package of revisions to EU 90/220/EEC makes increased provision for public consultation. In the coming months the Scottish Executive will be seeking the views of stakeholders as to how the implementation of the revised Directive should be taken forward.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 14 February 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 28 February 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive what weight will be given to the views of local residents and communities in determining whether approval for proposed GM crop trial sites should be granted and whether approval will be refused where there is substantial opposition.
Answer
The Scottish Executive is required to operate within European and UK Legislation on the deliberate release of genetically modified crops. Under Directive 90/220/EEC consent can only be refused where scientific evidence is available to suggest that the release would cause harm to human health or the environment. The legislation does not permit an application to be rejected solely in response to local opposition. A decision on that basis would be illegal.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 14 February 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 28 February 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will consider extending the formal notification period required in relation to proposed GM crop trial sites from 15 days to a longer period of 30 or 45 days, and, if so, how long it will make the notification period.
Answer
The current statutory notification period is determined in the Environmental Protection Act 1990. The Scottish Executive is aware however of the limited opportunity which this allows for public consideration and comment. Accordingly, assurances have been sought and gained from the biotechnology companies which will provide a longer notification period for this spring's farm evaluations. The exact period of notification has not yet been determined.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 14 February 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Allan Wilson on 28 February 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive how "local community" is defined in relation to rejection by sportscotland of applications for assistance from the Lottery Fund Sports Facilities Programme on grounds that the project does not demonstrate benefit to the sports life of the local community and, in particular, whether this phrase is interpreted with reference to geography alone or also takes account of community of interest.
Answer
The "local community", as applied to the Local Facilities Strand of the Sports Facilities Programme, is determined through sportscotland's supply/demand model and is the appropriate catchment for a particular facility type. This varies from facility to facility and is affected by location, geography and transportation.Other strands of the programme take account of "communities of interest". For example, the National and Regional strands focus on discrete sporting groups, including disabled persons.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 14 February 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jack McConnell on 28 February 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive how many examination appeals were submitted by 10 January 2001 from each local authority area for review under the procedure announced by the Minister for Education, Europe and External Affairs on 13 December 2000 and whether any cases put forward after this date have been excluded from the appeals review process solely because of their late submission.
Answer
Following my announcement on 13 December, the Executive wrote to all Education Authorities, Further Education colleges and heads of other centres on 18 December inviting them to submit requests for review by 10 January. By 19 January, the Appeals Review team had received 3,974 returns.In order to ensure that no appeals were excluded solely because of their late submission, the Appeals Review team accepted requests for review as late as 29 January when subject teams began their work. In a few very exceptional cases, requests have been accepted beyond this date. However, at this stage in the process it is no longer possible for the team to accept more new cases.As at 21 February, 4,216 cases were included in the appeals review process, and a breakdown of these cases by Education Authority is shown in the table.
Appeals Review 2000Numbers of cases by education authority
| ABERDEEN CITY | 86 |
| ABERDEENSHIRE | 210 |
| ANGUS | 100 |
| ARGYLL & BUTE | 81 |
| CLACKMANNAN | 14 |
| DUMFRIES & GALLOWAY | 238 |
| DUNDEE CITY | 94 |
| EAST AYRSHIRE | 136 |
| EAST DUNBARTONSHIRE | 117 |
| EAST LOTHIAN | 67 |
| EAST RENFREWSHIRE | 100 |
| CITY OF EDINBURGH | 276 |
| EILEAN SIAR | 47 |
| FALKIRK | 77 |
| FIFE | 271 |
| GLASGOW CITY | 253 |
| HIGHLAND | 139 |
| INVERCLYDE | 69 |
| MIDLOTHIAN | 68 |
| MORAY | 67 |
| NORTH AYRSHIRE | 96 |
| NORTH LANARKSHIRE | 184 |
| ORKNEY ISLANDS | 19 |
| PERTH & KINROSS | 66 |
| RENFREWSHIRE | 137 |
| SCOTTISH BORDERS | 163 |
| SHETLAND ISLANDS | 3 |
| SOUTH AYRSHIRE | 106 |
| SOUTH LANARKSHIRE | 147 |
| STIRLING | 72 |
| WEST DUNBARTON | 43 |
| WEST LOTHIAN | 92 |
| TOTAL | 3,638 |
| FE COLLEGES | 71 |
| INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS | 507 |
| TOTAL CASES | 4,216 |