Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 8 November 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1594 contributions

|

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Pre-budget Scrutiny 2025-26

Meeting date: 4 September 2024

Ross Greer

I have one final question, if that is okay with the convener.

Minister, you and I have recently been playing ping-pong with written questions about the issue of pay for college principals and whether that should align with the framework for the pay of chief executives, because those principals are the only equivalents in the public sector who do not align with that framework.

One of your answers to me said that although it is not for the Scottish Government to determine principals’ pay,

“The Scottish Government does however, expect that pay arrangements for senior staff ensure value for money, affordability and sustainability in the longer term.”

I responded by asking whether the Scottish Government believes that all senior staff pay within the college sector meets those objectives at the moment, and your answer to that was to refer me to your previous answer, which, with respect, is not an answer.

Will you take the opportunity now to clarify that, bearing in mind that some college principals in Scotland have remuneration packages that are far in excess of that of the First Minister? Do all college principals’ salary and remuneration packages at the moment meet your standards for value for money, affordability and sustainability in the long term?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Pre-budget Scrutiny 2025-26

Meeting date: 4 September 2024

Ross Greer

I absolutely agree that investigation is required first, but the issue is that the SFC has the power neither to investigate nor to take action.

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Pre-budget Scrutiny 2025-26

Meeting date: 4 September 2024

Ross Greer

Thank you, convener. I have a point about recurring costs in a slightly different area. The Scottish Government has been trying to support the universities that have had to pay increased employer contributions for the teacher superannuation scheme. What evaluation has the Government made of how sustainable that will be in the long term, as opposed to one-off funding to deal with the initial impact of what I believe was a relatively unexpected increase in employer contributions?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Pre-budget Scrutiny 2025-26

Meeting date: 4 September 2024

Ross Greer

Yes.

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Pre-budget Scrutiny 2025-26

Meeting date: 4 September 2024

Ross Greer

Thank you. If you have the opportunity to give a written update to the committee, I would look forward to that development.

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Pre-budget Scrutiny 2025-26

Meeting date: 4 September 2024

Ross Greer

That is useful. I have a couple of points for clarification. A lot of what you have just mentioned would require legislative change. Do you envisage that happening in this session of Parliament and as part of the programme of reform that you are taking forward before the next election?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Pre-budget Scrutiny 2025-26

Meeting date: 4 September 2024

Ross Greer

On the specific issue of fair work, do you agree with the broad thrust of my point, which is that the SFC needs more power to intervene when there are fair work issues?

I absolutely agree that colleges and their principals need more flexibility but, in the past 10 years, we have seen a range of acute problems at specific institutions and have seen examples of very poor work practices. As you mentioned, the SFC has limited ability to intervene. A sector-wide approach would not be appropriate because the problems have often been institution specific and the whole sector should not be “punished” for that. Do you agree that, if the SFC is being empowered to take further action, it should have the power to take further action with individual institutions that fail to meet their fair work obligations?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Pre-budget Scrutiny 2025-26

Meeting date: 4 September 2024

Ross Greer

Only a handful.

11:15  

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Scottish Fiscal Commission (Publications)

Meeting date: 3 September 2024

Ross Greer

To follow up on John Mason’s line of questioning about issuing bonds, I recognise that we have not done that before, so it would be uncharted territory. Do you have any expectations about the relative value for money in issuing bonds versus going through the national loan fund?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Scottish Fiscal Commission (Publications)

Meeting date: 3 September 2024

Ross Greer

That is a useful point. Thank you.

I have a question on public sector pay transparency. Going back to the discussion that we had last week, Graeme, I will put some of that on the record and follow up on Michael Marra’s line of questioning. You mentioned recognising that the Government cannot be completely transparent without beginning to undermine its negotiating position with the unions, which is perfectly understandable—the more transparent the Government is, the more the unions will see whatever figure is there as the floor from which to work up, which just takes the Government back into that space of having to find money from elsewhere.

You mentioned, though, the benefit of illustrative scenarios. Could you detail what you mean by that? Is it essentially to say that the Government can put one sum up front and say, “This is what we are looking at in terms of the cost of public sector pay,” or, “In terms of the pay strategy, we are looking at 3 per cent, plus 1.5 per cent for pay progression, but if it were to be more than that, here are the areas where that money would have to come from?” Are you talking about that kind of scenario, where there is a list of other areas of public spending that would be the first up for announcements like this afternoon’s?