Skip to main content

Parliament dissolved ahead of election

The Scottish Parliament is now dissolved ahead of the election on Thursday 7 May 2026.

During dissolution, there are no MSPs and no parliamentary business can take place.

For more information, please visit Election 2026

Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Session 6: 13 May 2021 to 8 April 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 3697 contributions

|

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Scottish Public Inquiries (Cost-effectiveness)

Meeting date: 3 June 2025

John Mason

Do you know whether the Scottish Parliament has the power to change the 2005 act?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Scottish Public Inquiries (Cost-effectiveness)

Meeting date: 3 June 2025

John Mason

Yes, because it seems that, sometimes, public pressure builds up and the minister eventually gives way and accepts the need for a public inquiry.

You have already been asked about the issue of terms of reference, so I will not go back over that, but I was interested to read this week that the families of the Chinook helicopter disaster would like there to be a public inquiry so that they can get hold of files. However, they simply want to get hold of those files, so I do not know that a public inquiry is needed. Is that a bit of an outlier? Is it the case that people call for a public inquiry when they want something else?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Scottish Public Inquiries (Cost-effectiveness)

Meeting date: 3 June 2025

John Mason

Some of the suggestions that you and other witnesses have made, such as sharing lawyers and setting up the rooms more rapidly, might save a little bit here and there, but I do not see how that would make a radical change to the cost of, and the time involved in, an inquiry. I have suggested to other witnesses that we might be able to look at it the other way round. We could tell people that they have three years and £5 million to do an inquiry and that they should just do the very best that they can within that framework. Would that be a major disadvantage, as compared with the open-ended approach that we seem to have? I put that to Ms McKee.

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Tertiary Education and Training (Funding and Governance) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 28 May 2025

John Mason

The convener has already raised a number of issues in the financial area, and that is where I want to go. The Parliament’s website says that a financial memorandum

“should set out best estimates of the costs, savings, and changes to revenues arising from a Bill.”

However, as I understand it from Mr Mott, we do not have an estimate of the pension costs. Does that mean that you are failing to give what is normally expected from a financial memorandum?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Tertiary Education and Training (Funding and Governance) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 28 May 2025

John Mason

I am not here to speak for the Finance and Public Administration Committee—Mr Greer and I are on both committees—but we absolutely support the simplification of the landscape as part of our public reform work, and we do not want there to be more public bodies. If we are simplifying things, I am absolutely on board and will totally support you on that, but we still have to look at the costs. The finance committee took evidence but did not have time to go into any detail with witnesses on that, which is why I am concerned about it.

Are you looking at whether the SFC would continue with two different pension schemes, or do you assume that it would go ahead and provide the better pension scheme for everyone?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Tertiary Education and Training (Funding and Governance) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 28 May 2025

John Mason

If the SFC needs more powers, I, for one, am open to giving it those powers now.

I take your point that a lot of the income of universities, in particular, does not come from the public purse. On the other hand, if a university gets into difficulty, it expects the public purse to bail it out, so there is quite a big risk. I fully accept that we have to get the report in due course.

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Tertiary Education and Training (Funding and Governance) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 28 May 2025

John Mason

I am just looking for some reassurance that a small provider getting into trouble would not hugely disadvantage learners.

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Tertiary Education and Training (Funding and Governance) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 28 May 2025

John Mason

Yes—we would expect internal and external audit to be involved in that process for the universities, so I will be very interested to see what the report comes out with.

On financial sustainability, we are thinking mainly about universities and colleges, but what about other training providers, such as those in the private sector? Is there any need to oversee them and look at their financial sustainability, or can we simply rely on the private sector to look after that aspect?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Tertiary Education and Training (Funding and Governance) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 28 May 2025

John Mason

So, broadly, you would have more confidence in a bigger organisation than in a smaller one.

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Tertiary Education and Training (Funding and Governance) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 28 May 2025

John Mason

Okay—I am happy to leave it at that.