The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 390 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Neil Bibby
Are there any other thoughts from panel members on that question?
The key difference between Taith and Turing is that the former is reciprocal, whereas the latter only allows for outward mobility. Another important difference is that Taith is open to staff as well as learners, but Turing is only open to learners. Is there data yet that details how staff and inward students engage with Taith? If so, when could that become available?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Neil Bibby
Yes.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Neil Bibby
I want to compare Erasmus with the Turing scheme. Under Erasmus, participating countries waived their tuition fees. However, under Turing, the Government placed only an expectation on institutions that they would waive fees. Given the pressure on university finances across the UK, is there any data on whether universities have waived fees? If an institution does not waive its fees, has that had an impact on engagement by students from disadvantaged backgrounds? Also—this is specifically for Ellie Bevan—what is the position in Wales with the Taith scheme? Is it the same?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Neil Bibby
Thanks very much.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Neil Bibby
Good morning. Only 36 projects have been funded by the Scottish education exchange programme, compared to 199 for the Taith scheme in Wales. Has the Scottish Government acted quickly enough, given that the Welsh Government has had the Taith scheme operating since 2022?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Neil Bibby
Are there any other thoughts on that?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Neil Bibby
Costs were mentioned. I think that the reluctance at the UK level to adopt or take forward Erasmus+ has been on the basis of costs. It is fair to assume, as has been mentioned, that the reason behind any prevention of Scotland adopting a scheme like Taith, which operates in Wales, has also been about the cost to the Scottish Government. I am not sure whether anyone knows of reasons other than costs for why such a scheme has not been adopted in Scotland. If there are other reasons, I am interested to hear them.
A number of witnesses have touched on the impact on disadvantaged students. Sai Viswanathan mentioned drop-out rates. In comparison with Erasmus+, has the Turing scheme provided a demographic shift to disadvantaged students? That was the ethos behind it. I am interested to get the witnesses’ thoughts on that.
We have information from the House of Commons library and the Department for Education that shows that, over the past few years, the number of participating students in England has increased and that, in Scotland, it has fallen. The percentage of disadvantaged participants in Scotland has fallen from 51 per cent in 2022-23 to 45 per cent in 2024-25. In England, it has risen from 53 per cent to 55 per cent in the same period. In Wales, it has fallen from 37 per cent to 33 per cent.
Obviously, different things are happening in different countries. In comparison with Erasmus+, has the Turing scheme provided a demographic shift to disadvantaged students? Do those figures also include drop-out rates?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Neil Bibby
That is helpful. Thanks for your answers.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 23 January 2025
Neil Bibby
I need to ask about “The Traitors”, although I am not looking for spoilers, because I have not caught up yet—that is not what I meant.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 23 January 2025
Neil Bibby
As we have heard, there are a lot of concerns about London-based production groups having a nominal base in Scotland and being counted in the Scottish production quotas. Earlier, we mentioned the different sorts of definition. One clear definition of a production that would qualify as Scottish could involve someone living and working in Scotland and having a company that is based in Scotland. However, there is an issue whereby, essentially, a production could qualify as Scottish simply because it has a person with a desk in an office in Scotland. If you would not go for the definition that involves someone living and working in Scotland and having a company based here—I think that Hayley Valentine suggested that that should not be the definition—what do you think that the definition should be?