The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2290 contributions
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Miles Briggs
I am pleased to speak on behalf of the Scottish Conservatives about the appointment of Ben Macpherson as Minister for Higher and Further Education. For many people in Edinburgh, Ben first came to our attention in the summer of 2004, when he walked from Edinburgh to London to raise awareness of the annual international day of peace. After the events of the past week, perhaps the Government could, indeed, do with the qualities of spreading peace and love, which I know Mr Macpherson will bring to the role.
Those who follow politics will know that two notable ministers decided to leave the Scottish Government under Humza Yousaf in March 2023—Ben Macpherson and the First Minister—so it is not surprising that both have returned to the Government.
In 2016, I was elected alongside Ben Macpherson to represent constituents in Edinburgh. I know that members across the chamber have always recognised him as a good friend, and he is an MSP who is both respected and rated by all in the chamber.
I am sure that Ben, as a proud George Heriot’s boy, will be at the forefront of making the case in the Scottish Government for continued support for our independent schools in Edinburgh.
Ben Macpherson is a keen supporter of apprentices. Members might not know this, but he served his own apprenticeship in his youth, when he was involved in the Edinburgh Labour Party and did work experience with the local MSP for Edinburgh Northern and Leith, Malcolm Chisholm. Like all good apprentices, he decided to do what many do and went on to take his job in 2016.
As the First Minister has stated, Ben Macpherson returns to the Government with significant ministerial experience. On a personal note, I hope that this will, indeed, be his last junior ministerial apprenticeship. The Conservatives wish him well in his role in the Government.
14:24Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Miles Briggs
On a point of order, Presiding Officer. During the passage of the bill, I lodged amendments 22 and 26 and a package of amendments that would have allowed local authorities to set a flat rate for the visitor levy. I believe that the minister is misinforming the Parliament.
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Miles Briggs
The cabinet secretary has stated that the findings come from the profession. I agree, and one of the most concerning aspects of the findings is that—this is what teachers say—the current national guidance “disempowers teachers”.
Does the cabinet secretary accept that and does she accept that there is an association between falling standards, poor attendance and poor behaviour? Does she think that the plans that the Scottish Government has set out will turn the situation around?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Miles Briggs
How would you see that working in practice?
In some of the casework that I—and probably most colleagues—have had, it is about that point at the age of 16 when a CSO can be removed, and when a young person will often either be encouraged, or want, to get out of services. However, the aftermath of that is that they are not able to take a step back into services. Do you see that working as an appeals process or as being a right that the young person has, according to the principles of good transition, to be able to go back into services if they want? It is not clear in the bill whether it is an appeals process or how it would function. That was a long question.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Miles Briggs
I have a few more questions, but I will come back to them later.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Miles Briggs
I will return to the register of foster carers, which the bill proposes and which is to be set out in regulations at a later date. What is your assessment of those proposals? How do you think that they can be improved?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Miles Briggs
Does anyone else want to add anything on the register?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Miles Briggs
That is helpful.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Miles Briggs
I have a question on the register of foster carers. I put the same question to the witnesses at last week’s session. There has been some welcome comment in response to the committee’s call for views in support of a register, but how do you think it will work in practice, given that the detail will be set out in regulations at a later date? What is your assessment of the proposals for a register in the bill, and how could they be improved?
Does anyone have a view on that? I know that we have witnesses on the next panel who will have views on the proposals.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Miles Briggs
Good morning to the witnesses. I thank you for joining us.
I have a couple of questions. I will start now and continue later in the session. My first question relates specifically to aftercare, which we heard some organisations’ views on last week. Who Cares? Scotland stated in its submission that the aftercare provisions in the bill could go even further—I agree with that—and others have raised concerns with the committee around estimated costs. How might those provisions be improved, and how can the Scottish Government ensure that they are adequately resourced?
I mentioned Who Cares? Scotland, so I ask Laura Pasternak to start, and then anyone else can come in.