The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2176 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Miles Briggs
In that whole period, from July 2023 to then, you were not involved and there was never a mention of anything.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Miles Briggs
That is pretty amazing.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Miles Briggs
At what point were you aware of needing to provide that information? Was it only at the very end, with the letter that I have here from your chief operating officer, which says:
“The Principal has asked that I drop you a line”?
Was that the point at which you were aware of all those duties?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Miles Briggs
From reading Professor Gillies’s report, I note that she and the investigation team found it really difficult to get the paper trail. The report states:
“The Principal either was made aware or should have been made aware of the potential breach and a judgement made of whether to report this to the SFC.”
It feels as though a lot of that information was not being written down and could not be accessed. You said that you prefer to have conversations. Is it fair to say that conversations were being had with other professionals whom you expected to take forward the work? Have you ever asked the chief operating officer or anyone else in the institution to limit the information that was being sent to the Scottish Funding Council?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Miles Briggs
In relation to the questions that my colleague Michael Marra put to you about the money running out at some point, at no point did you ask, “Where are we with the creditors?” You were not aware of the concerns that they clearly had.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Miles Briggs
Thank you.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Miles Briggs
I am referring to an article from 23 June. If I was in your shoes, I would have prepared and expected all those questions.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Miles Briggs
I can understand that, to be quite frank.
The Gillies report talks specifically about extravagant spending. Do you recognise that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Miles Briggs
What about your expenses? I have looked through those listed in the auditor’s report. The expenses are all for first-class-only travel and top hotels. The auditor took significant umbrage at the fact that they did not meet any of the university’s outlined policies. You did not care about any of that; it just had to be the best for you, wherever you were going.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Miles Briggs
I have two more questions. The first returns to what other members have asked you. You have said that you are taking responsibility and have given a heartfelt apology. Would it not be an act of recognition of the role that you played in creating the situation that the University of Dundee now finds itself in if you paid back that £150,000? I do not know how many staff members’ jobs would be saved by your doing so, but do you recognise that it could be really important for you to send a message to the students and staff who are left at the University of Dundee that you understand your role in the saga?