The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 6348 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Edward Mountain
Thank you, Sarah—there is nothing like being told what to do as convener by a committee member. I might refer to those later questions that you wanted to ask. [Laughter.]
To make it clear, when I talked about a river earlier, I was not referring to the River Spey. If I had been, I would have had to declare an interest. In case anyone thinks that I was, I declare that I have an interest in the River Spey.
Let us move on to penalties. The penalties are 20 years in prison and an unlimited fine. That is massive. Is that required—yes or no?
Jamie Whittle can go first.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Edward Mountain
That is an interesting situation, because I do not think that doing something that you know is wrong is a defence for doing that act. History has proven that saying that you are following orders is not a good enough excuse for doing something wrong. I was not quite sure that I had followed the previous issue.
The deputy convener mentioned an unlimited fine and 20 years in the nick. An unlimited fine might mean nothing if you get a huge bonus, whereas a fine of £500 for somebody who has very little income, perhaps a crofter, might be massive and might be a death knell to their business, so I do not quite understand how that range works. One of the suggestions was to link fines to the turnover of the organisation. How do you feel about that? Scottish Water has a massive turnover and a massive amount of money, and it could pay a massive fine. A crofter on the west coast has very little turnover and should get only a very little fine. What do you think? Professor Parsons, do you want to refute that comment?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Edward Mountain
That is an interesting idea—because it is a public sector organisation, it does not get a fine. I am sure that that is not quite how you would put it, but that is my interpretation.
Jonnie, what are your views on that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Edward Mountain
I call Sarah Boyack—but very briefly, please.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Edward Mountain
It might then be a matter of who in the Government you would hold accountable.
Mark Ruskell may ask a supplementary question, if it could be a really quick one, please.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Edward Mountain
That was quite a long question, but I am going to squeeze the time that you have to answer it. Please be as succinct as possible.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Edward Mountain
This morning’s two evidence sessions have raised a heap of questions on the bill that the committee will want to consider. We might want to discuss some hypothetical situations so that we understand what could happen. The evidence has been really helpful. I thank the witnesses and ask them to leave the room as quickly as possible, because we are up against the clock and about to go into private session.
12:04 Meeting continued in private until 12:59.Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 September 2025
Edward Mountain
09:39
Our third item of business is consideration of petition PE2123, which has been submitted by Asthma and Lung UK Scotland and asks the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to amend the Air Quality Standards (Scotland) Regulations 2010. The petitioner wants new limits to be set for nitrogen dioxide and fine particulate matter in order to align with the World Health Organization’s 2021 air quality targets.
The committee first considered the petition in April, and we agreed to write to the Scottish Government for an update on its review of the second cleaner air for Scotland strategy. The Scottish Government responded on 22 April; and when we considered the petition again, on 13 May, we agreed to write to stakeholders who responded to our 2023 air quality report, along with a few other interested parties, highlighting the Scottish Government’s response and seeking their views.
Paper 2 sets out some options for further scrutiny, which include writing to the Government and closing the petition, if we consider that appropriate. Do members have any views on what has been suggested in the paper?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 September 2025
Edward Mountain
Let me see if I can summarise all of that, if I may.
I think that we are suggesting that we write a letter to the Government, drawing its attention to the evidence that we have received on this matter as well as the recommendations from various organisations that the Government consider alignment with the World Health Organization’s strategy. We will also ask the Government for its views on where we are and make sure that it is logged that, when the cleaner air for Scotland 2 strategy comes up for review, our successor committee is kept informed.
That is the basis on which we are agreeing to close the petition. If we are happy with that—and as I do not see anyone violently shaking their head, I guess that we are sort of happy—I ask the committee to delegate power to me to sign off the letter to the Government on the petition and to write to the petitioner on the committee’s behalf, thanking them for bringing this matter to our attention so that we could work on it. Is the committee happy with that?
Members indicated agreement.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 September 2025
Edward Mountain
I think that that concludes all the things that we are doing in public this morning.
09:46 Meeting continued in private until 10:39.