The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2025 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Douglas Ross
That brings us nicely to a point that John Mason wants to make, so I will hand over to him before I continue with my questions.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Douglas Ross
Is the figure for academic support £2.3 million, roughly?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Douglas Ross
Do you accept that academic support is also provided by the colleges so there is duplication? What you provide, through the executive office and the top slice that you take from the colleges, is also provided by the colleges locally.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Douglas Ross
Finally, we have heard from other witnesses today about the challenges around capital. People who come from Moray, as I do, are particularly worried about Moray college, which is in older buildings in which there has been limited investment—indeed, some of the classrooms have had to be closed and people have moved offices and suchlike. There is a worry that a general lack of investment will make it easier in the future for UHI to say, “Despite our best efforts, Moray college can’t continue, because it would cost too much to upgrade the current building or to build a new one. Therefore, students can go elsewhere—it’s only 40 miles to Inverness.”
What would you say to dampen those concerns or to remove them completely? Moray needs the students to go there. The students who study at Moray college achieve very good outcomes. The principal, David Patterson, is doing a great job under very trying circumstances—we have heard that all principals are working under trying circumstances at the moment—in leading the college’s outstanding staff. Can you give a guarantee that there will always be a UHI Moray in Moray?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Douglas Ross
What about your responsibility?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Douglas Ross
However, you did not intervene until the college reached a critical point. It was in a very difficult financial situation—it was reporting millions of pounds of losses—and the principal was on the cusp of resigning.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Douglas Ross
Another complex problem is the regional strategic body. Before that, we had the further education regional board.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Douglas Ross
An SFC review of the UHI regional strategic body that was carried out in 2020 outlined a number of differences between the two. Is it correct that the further education regional board had an independent chair?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Douglas Ross
Can you understand that there is concern that some of those voices have been lost, given that all nine chairs used to be on the predecessor board and, now, two chairs attend, with a third possibly being invited? Now that the chair of the court chairs the RSB, there is not the same independence as there was when there was an independent chair. That means that, if the leadership of the UHI wants to get something through, it can now do that. With the regional strategic body rubber stamping proposals, there is less opportunity for dialogue and debate and, perhaps, for colleges to propose changes.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Douglas Ross
That is very interesting. I welcome that. Can I take it that that was an admission that you are not inclusive enough at the moment? If the court must change to be more inclusive, as you just said, does that not suggest that you are not inclusive enough at the moment?