The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2871 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Douglas Ross
I am not asking you to go into the specifics. Do you agree with Social Work Scotland that the bill could have been vastly improved had the consultation been better?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Douglas Ross
I know. You said, “Yes,” and then, when Pam Duncan-Glancy asked how that could happen, you started to give an answer. When you asked for the question to be repeated, you then said that Pam Duncan-Glancy was correct and that it was not possible. I am just wondering why the senior lawyer on the panel did not pick up on that.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Douglas Ross
You do not need to press your button.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Douglas Ross
Which was completely different to what the minister had just said, but she corrected herself. I am just wondering why no one else on the panel sought to correct that because, had Pam Duncan-Glancy not challenged it, that would have been the information that we had on the record. However, we can go away and look at it again if we want.
On this point, minister, I am sorry, but I am going back to where I started this morning. This has been a major issue, both with the written submissions and oral evidence. I understand that I am not allowed to repeat what was said to us in our private session, but we had your officials on their own with us, and this issue was raised with them right at the very beginning. How is it that we are at the point of coming to write a report on this bill, but you are still seeking advice on it?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Douglas Ross
Paul McLennan wants to come in on that point.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Douglas Ross
Well, there is a very simple amendment—
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Douglas Ross
Is that you, Mr Adam?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Douglas Ross
This issue came up in our evidence sessions and it is not unique to this bill. For example, the exact same issues were raised by stakeholders with the Housing (Scotland) Bill, and amendments were drafted at stage 2. There seems to be an issue in the Government about this problem. When you heard in the evidence that there was an almost identical problem in the Housing (Scotland) Bill, did you not go to the Cabinet Secretary for Housing, or did your officials not go to officials in other departments, and say, “How do we resolve this?” Did you ask the Cabinet Secretary for Housing about it?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Douglas Ross
But you are not suggesting changes at the moment.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Douglas Ross
When will we get an update on that? It clearly cannot be part of our stage 1 report, so will it be before the stage 1 debate and vote? Will it be before stage 2?