The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2871 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Douglas Ross
I will come to Mr Henderson now, because I want to read some more quotes out, and he might want to speak about them all.
I was really surprised that there was such strong criticism from The Promise Scotland, an organisation—[Interruption.] You know about its concerns.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Douglas Ross
What I am saying, minister, is that I am going to start reading out a massive list of different organisations that have been highly critical—organisations that I, whether as an Opposition spokesperson or as an Opposition member, expected to be generally supportive of the bill. Some of them were, but they were at pains to tell us how badly you and your officials had consulted them prior to the introduction of this important piece of legislation. If it is such a big personal honour for you, I do not understand how you can now just ignore what they have said.
Before I read out that list, why did you mention the ministerial code? What were you getting at there?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Douglas Ross
Will you provide the committee with more information about that cross-departmental work?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Douglas Ross
That is because it has come up so much in our evidence, which is why I had hoped that we would be further on today regarding our deliberations. Do you understand that frustration?
10:45Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Douglas Ross
No, no—if you have seen it, it will quickly come into your consciousness. It says that the bill
“as currently drafted, does not give the same rights to those who left care before their 16th Birthday as those who are aged 16 to 19 years who left care after their 16th Birthday”.
It goes on:
“the Bill gives the lower level of support and protection by way of the restricted rights which are currently available to 19 to 26 year olds under s29(2)”
of the Children (Scotland) Act 1995. That is exactly what Willie Rennie is saying, and people are coming to the committee and telling us that. If they are watching this evidence session today, they will not have taken any comfort from your responses.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Douglas Ross
The minister is not happy with it.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Douglas Ross
Yes.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Douglas Ross
However, it is right to highlight this as an issue of concern.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Douglas Ross
Yes, but did you reach out in response to the concerns about the lack of consultation?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Douglas Ross
The last criticism that I will read out before Mr Henderson comes in is from CELCIS—no, I am sorry; it is from Social Work Scotland. This is a quote from John Trainer, from when he was at the committee:
“the Government did not do sufficient engagement with a range of stakeholders during the development of the bill. That is disappointing. The bill could have been strengthened had the Government engaged across the professional bodies that work to support Scotland’s children, young people and care-experienced adults. It would have been vastly improved if that had happened”.—[Official Report, Education, Children and Young People Committee, 8 October 2025; c 45.]
What do you make of that comment from Social Work Scotland, which was made to this committee on 8 October?