Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 21 September 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2378 contributions

|

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

National Planning Framework 4

Meeting date: 29 November 2022

Willie Coffey

Tom Arthur spoke at great length about NPF4, which was very welcome. We cannot do it alone. It is not a stand-alone document. It will be wide-ranging, cross-sector and so on. We have had some of that discussion over the time that we have looked at the progress of NPF4.

Last week, Professor Hague widened it out to talk about how it might interact and interface with other Government departments. We heard, too, from our Irish Government colleagues. Their departments set out how they will deliver their priorities within their own national planning framework. Do you see that happening in Scotland? Will other Scottish departments be able to demonstrate how their policy delivery interfaces and interacts with NPF4?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

National Planning Framework 4

Meeting date: 29 November 2022

Willie Coffey

Do you think that local people have enough understanding of what we mean by community wealth building? Do they get it? That is the question, minister. How will the public shape community wealth-building plans as they develop? The committee has always been in favour of the view that Governments and councils should not do things to people. Rather, we should do things with them and embrace people at ground level in order to enable them to shape policy development. Do you think that there is enough local knowledge of what we mean by community wealth building, and are there enough opportunities for people to get involved in the process to help shape policy development?

10:15  

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

National Care Service (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 29 November 2022

Willie Coffey

Good. Thank you.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

National Planning Framework 4

Meeting date: 29 November 2022

Willie Coffey

Okay. Those comments are very welcome.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

National Care Service (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 29 November 2022

Willie Coffey

Good afternoon to everyone on the panel. I want to go back to Derek Feeley’s report. One of the key stand-outs for me—I have read it many times—is the point that the driving focus should be

“consistency, quality and equity of care and support experienced by service users”.

That is at the heart of the Feeley review. Is the national care service the instrument to deliver that consistency of service across Scotland? I ask Adam Stachura to pitch in with an answer.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

National Care Service (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 29 November 2022

Willie Coffey

I have a question about accountability. Last week, the minister said that, very often, he fields questions in the Parliament but has no accountability for many of the issues that are raised with him. Do you agree that national accountability is needed at ministerial level? I would appreciate a simple yes or no so that other colleagues can ask their questions.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

National Planning Framework 4

Meeting date: 29 November 2022

Willie Coffey

During our evidence-taking, the committee also discussed the infrastructure first approach to the planning system across Scotland. What level of buy-in is there from infrastructure providers to support that approach? We heard evidence from witnesses about how important buy-in is to delivering and achieving that. How confident are you that that can be done?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

National Planning Framework 4

Meeting date: 22 November 2022

Willie Coffey

Good morning. I am glad that the witnesses have widened out the discussion. I was hopeful that some of the issues that concern me as a local member and have done for many years would be solved in NPF4, and I would like to get your views on whether they are.

Professor Hague talked about things such as derelict buildings, empty shops and offshore retail owners, and the inability to reach out to those bits of society to get them to play their part. I very much hoped that NPF4 would enable us to deal with some of that. If you look around any city, town or village in Scotland, you will see examples all over the place of urban dereliction and decay, abandoned shops, abandoned land, absentee owners and absentee shareholders, whoever they may be.

I thought to myself, “What is the role for NPF4 in addressing that big issue, because it is what matters to the citizens in my constituency?” Professor Hague talked about perhaps having citizen stakeholders to get a bottom-up approach and solution to the issue. Was it too much to expect NPF4 to address that? What could we do additionally to help NPF4 to deal with that problem in the urban setting?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

National Planning Framework 4

Meeting date: 22 November 2022

Willie Coffey

It was on local development plans. Is there a pressing urgency for the planning authorities to revise those plans to get them into fit enough local shape? There are provisions in the new NPF4 that will impact on the local development plans.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

National Planning Framework 4

Meeting date: 22 November 2022

Willie Coffey

You both mentioned the local development plans. Is there a pressing urgency for local planning authorities to review their LDPs, particularly when the new NPF4 might include references that are perhaps not contained in their current LDPs? Do the planning authorities need to revise and review those as soon as they can?