Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 22 September 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2378 contributions

|

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2021/22 audit of National Records of Scotland”

Meeting date: 15 December 2022

Willie Coffey

I turn to the digital aspect of the census. Were we hampered in Scotland by the public’s access to digital devices to complete the online survey? Could you start by telling us what the difference was between this census and the previous one? There was a big digital and online component to this census, which was not the case before, so has that been a significant factor?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2021/22 audit of National Records of Scotland”

Meeting date: 15 December 2022

Willie Coffey

Did NRS look at variations in population in relation to the level of access that people have to information technology and skills and so on? I was well aware of that when I ran the cross-party group in digital exclusion. There were huge differences, even within Scotland, of access to digital technology for people. Despite people’s willingness to participate in the online world, there is still an issue about whether some can actually do that. Will the further work try to investigate the portions of the population that could not participate as fully as they might have wished to?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2021/22 audit of National Records of Scotland”

Meeting date: 15 December 2022

Willie Coffey

I am curious about that, because we talk about target rates and response rates and they are entirely different things, as we all know. The UK target was not 97 per cent; it was 94 per cent. I am curious about why we think that we are significantly above or below when we do not know what target we are trying to reach for the survey to be valid. I note that in your report, Auditor General, you say that the census target response rate for Scotland’s local authorities was 85 per cent, which was exceeded by the actual response rate. I also note, from the ONS report on the census survey that was carried out in England and Wales, that the target was 80 per cent for local authorities in England and Wales. Why was there a lower target for response rates for England and Wales compared with that of Scotland?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2021/22 audit of National Records of Scotland”

Meeting date: 15 December 2022

Willie Coffey

Auditor General, before I ask a couple of questions about the work that remains to be done and some questions on the digital aspect of the census, I would like to know whether there is a standard—an industry standard or otherwise—percentage return rate that would be required to get a representative sample of the population in something like a census? What is the percentage figure or is there none?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2021/22 audit of National Records of Scotland”

Meeting date: 15 December 2022

Willie Coffey

The point that I am trying to make is that, if a target is set lower and the response rate significantly exceeds it, it looks as though the performance is better than might otherwise have been expected. The higher that a target is set, the more difficult it is to do that.

I will move on to another question on your report. As one of your key messages, you say:

“Significant work remains to be done during 2022/23 to ensure that the census delivers robust population estimates and other outputs.”

Will you tell us a wee bit more about what that work involves?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Local Governance Review

Meeting date: 13 December 2022

Willie Coffey

To save us from going round the whole panel with the same question, does any of our councillors have an alternative view on the expectation of more power and more funding? Is that a good thing to promote? Should we carry on with that line, or should we be cautious about it?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Local Governance Review

Meeting date: 13 December 2022

Willie Coffey

Councillor Stockan or Councillor Macaulay, do you have any final comments on that?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Local Governance Review

Meeting date: 13 December 2022

Willie Coffey

Thanks very much for that, everybody—it was very helpful.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Local Governance Review

Meeting date: 13 December 2022

Willie Coffey

Councillor Macaulay, has there been progress since the governance review was started? Could you share a few thoughts with us?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Local Governance Review

Meeting date: 13 December 2022

Willie Coffey

Good morning, everyone. Forgive my croaky voice this morning.

I want to take you back to the local governance review, which I understand kicked off in 2017, with most of the work being done in 2018-19. It was then paused, for obvious reasons, because of Covid. I want to get a few sentences from each of you about what you think has been achieved in the local governance review to date and whether you are satisfied with, if not the timescale of the progress, the content and delivery of what has been discussed. I will start with Councillor Ross.