The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2155 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 16 June 2022
Willie Coffey
You mentioned the owner observation reports. The information that we have is that there were about 346 of them and that 180 were carried out while 166 were rejected or are still outstanding. Does that fall within normal quality management procedures where the customer requests changes and the person who is delivering the contract either agrees or disagrees that they can be made? Is that where the dispute resolution issue fell? Was there a failure to agree about changes or rejected change requests? How did that work?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 16 June 2022
Willie Coffey
Thank you for all that detail. The committee has been trying to get feedback on those issues, and your input today on the record is helping the committee to understand.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2022
Willie Coffey
Thank you. Would Karen Birch and Maria de la Torre like to comment on the 250m2 issue?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2022
Willie Coffey
I am happy with those responses, convener, and happy to let colleagues come in.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2022
Willie Coffey
Good morning. Before I ask a few questions about guidance on the 2015 act and the 250m2 assumption—[Inaudible]—on whether people who are on the waiting list are participating in other projects such as community garden spaces and so on.
The reason why I ask is that East Ayrshire does not have any allotments, they tell me, and it does not have anybody applying, but there are a number of examples of community garden spaces here, there and everywhere. Ian, you said there were 5,400 or so people on waiting lists in Edinburgh and maybe 1,800 in Glasgow. Are those people participating by other means or are they just not able to do so at all? What is the picture?
10:45Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2022
Willie Coffey
I think that Rosanne Woods has talked about the 250 m² requirement. Does there need to be flexibility around that? Do local authorities have to allocate 250 m², or could we be more flexible? Could we give people some kind of entry-level plot that is perhaps easier to manage, and might enable us to allocate smaller allotment sizes and spaces to people in order to get those waiting lists down? Should we be more flexible about the requirement for 250 m² that is in the legislation?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2022
Willie Coffey
Karen, do you or Maria want to come in?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2022
Willie Coffey
Thank you. What do you think, Ian?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 June 2022
Willie Coffey
Mo, would you say that that was a value-for-money appointment? We understand that it was very expensive to make.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 June 2022
Willie Coffey
Good morning. I want to open up discussion on the nationalisation issue, which Colin Beattie led questions on that Colin Cook tried to answer. That was a huge decision to have made without a technical appraisal or some kind of technical diligence check being carried out. Colin Cook, will you explain why that was not, or could not, be done at that point to give us the fullest possible picture of whether the nationalisation process was the best course of action to take?