The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2315 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 2 May 2023
Willie Coffey
I will lead on the same issues as those that I asked the previous panel about, and I will start with John Kerr.
One issue is the extent to which tenants are responsible for the conditions that they live in because of their lifestyle. We are talking specifically about condensation, dampness and mould. You will be aware that the ombudsman in England issued a warning to social landlords to avoid blaming tenants for those conditions. Do you recognise that it is still an issue in Scotland that, in many cases, we say to our tenants that it is their lifestyle that causes condensation, dampness and mould in their homes?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 27 April 2023
Willie Coffey
Was there a sense that any of the workforce received a bonus payment? Was it just the six senior managers whom you referred to in the report who received them?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 27 April 2023
Willie Coffey
Auditor General, you mentioned the word “completion”. That was part of whatever shape the KPI framework took. People decided to award themselves a bonus on completion of the hull, which was years late. How on earth can that have been? Why was that not for “successful completion” or “timescaled completion”? Why was that kind of language not part of a bonus award scheme? How could that still be validly paid, even if the completion was years late?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 27 April 2023
Willie Coffey
Do you think that that money is ultimately recoverable? I need to ask that question, and I am sure that the public are asking it. It beggars belief that a bonus could be applied, given that the boats are five years late. What constitutes bonus criteria in any of that to justify the senior managers taking that award?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 27 April 2023
Willie Coffey
Can you pinpoint any timing issue? When exactly were the bonuses taken compared with when more public funds were being given to the yard? Can you draw any comparison there? Were they closely associated in time? I am trying to get at whether the bonuses were paid while the public purse was paying the yard more money to complete the ships.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 27 April 2023
Willie Coffey
You have answered the question about whether FMPG sought approval, and you have made it clear that it did not.
Finally, Auditor General, do you think that the decision to award the bonus payments shows a complete lack of awareness of the seriousness of the situation in the yard? Do you think that the management team awarding itself those bonuses was completely and utterly inappropriate?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 27 April 2023
Willie Coffey
I think that we needed that assurance. Clearly, the secondments provide an income stream. We are waiting for the value and the figures that are associated with that. That income will go to the yard, but it is the Scottish Government that is ultimately paying for the contractors who come in. Provided that those are different skills, however, that is the assurance that we are looking for.
I have a few questions on the bonus payment issue. Auditor General, you said in your opening remarks that FMPG is required to comply with the Scottish public finance manual requirements. Do you think that the process of awarding those bonuses to the senior management team without any reference to performance indicators complies with the requirements in the manual?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 27 April 2023
Willie Coffey
Who would have ultimately approved that? Was that a senior management or a board decision? Surely the six people who got the bonus were not part of that decision-making process.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 27 April 2023
Willie Coffey
Auditor General, the yard is able to offer 18 secondments to BAE Systems, and yet it is bringing in contractors to complete the work that we are discussing. How do we square that? Are the skills that are going out different from the ones that are needed to come in? Can you explain that? It does not make sense to me that the yard would let 18 staff be seconded when it needs to bring in contractors to complete the work.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 25 April 2023
Willie Coffey
I want to touch on leadership, accountability and whether there is a role for audit in the CPP process. The committee has heard some great examples of CPPs that are working particularly well in a number of areas of Scotland, but that is not uniform; some CPPs might need some assistance and help to improve, and one of the ingredients that we think might contribute to that is effective local leadership. I want to find out whether you agree with that.
Someone who gave evidence to the committee made the really useful comment that effective leaders
“should leave silos, logos and egos at the door”,—[Official Report, Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee, 7 March 2023; c 69.]
which struck a chord with members.
Broadly speaking, minister, do you agree? Is there a job of work to be done in sharing good practice in local leadership to make CPPs more effective?