The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1329 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
My questions cover costs and resources, but I think that you have covered most of that theme as we have gone through. We have talked about the Law Society in relation to the McCulloch case. In addition, the Law Society highlighted the potential risk of “significant litigation” arising from the bill. Might you take the opportunity to comment on that?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
The Law Society’s specific concern—which it suggested was about an “unintended consequence”—was that, if someone did not get the treatment and something then happened, their surviving relatives or partner could sue. Your financial memorandum does not include that litigation cost, but it is obvious that it could be significant.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
So, you have not included any cost for that.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
I am sorry, but I want to clarify that further. Someone for whom that is an agreed pathway should not expect to immediately—in three weeks’ time—be in a rehab facility, because all that other process would need to happen.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
Carolyn Currie mentioned that it is a challenge for female-led businesses to access apprenticeships. Vikki Manson talked about the same challenge for small businesses. We hear that SDS is brilliant at speaking to businesses, but it is clear that it is not speaking to female-led businesses or small businesses.
What is going on? What is your message for SDS? Whatever happens with the bill, the big industries that Paul Campbell and SAAB represent—such as Scottish Water, which is a huge employer and is very different from the businesses that Carolyn Currie and Vikki Manson talked about—will deal with it. Do you have a message for whoever takes over about engaging with small businesses and women’s businesses?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
I have some questions about private providers. We had some private providers giving evidence last week, and they are clearly not all the same.
The bill contains proposals for a process to approve private providers of further and higher education for the purposes of student support. Clearly, there is the potential for private provision to increase. In response to our call for views, we had some suggestions that there may be a lack of clarity in the checks and balances on those private providers that would be required in terms of student support. It would be good to hear your thoughts on that and anything in the bill you think should be changed to make it stronger.
Sarah, you have mentioned the issue a couple of times. You were polite in calling them independent.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
Good morning. Cabinet secretary, you touched on the bill’s requirement for a medical diagnosis. We have heard in previous evidence sessions some concern about that formalisation. The Government’s written evidence addresses the issue, but can you say a bit more about the Government’s concerns in that regard and address the concern that one of the unintended consequences of that requirement could be a challenge to existing services that do not require a formal diagnosis?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
You will have noticed that, last week, we spent a bit of time talking about the transfer of staff from SDS to the SFC. It would be good to hear your thoughts on that and on what we need to do to make sure that that transition is smooth. Jon Vincent mentioned that one of the strengths of SDS is its engagement with employers. Does it give you any confidence that the folk who are doing that engagement on the ground are transferring from SDS to the SFC?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
I want to talk about student support, because it has been suggested in some of the responses to our call for views that there is no clarity about what is expected of private independent providers with regard to support for students. Sarah Dalrymple talked about the mental health support that her organisation provides, which sounds really good. Does that kind of thing happen everywhere, or should the bill be clearer about what support students should be receiving?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
Yes, I think so.
Phiona, what are your thoughts on this? Would it be helpful to students if this aspect were made clear in the legislation going through Parliament so that things were fair across the board? We know that all three of your organisations are superstars in what you are doing, but do we need to ensure that all the organisations that provide apprenticeships are superstars?