The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1519 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
Thanks very much for that. That will definitely be appreciated by my constituents.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
Do Andrew Watson or Gavin Henderson want to add anything around this? There are obviously many shared responsibilities.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
Thanks for that. That all sounds good. David, do you want to add your comments?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
Gosh, I almost want to change my questions after hearing the points that David Anderson made in answer to Colin Beattie’s questions. I will try and shift a little bit, however.
David was mostly talking about the Scottish Government’s responsibilities and how it has interacted. I am keen that we all recognise that the Promise was made by not just the Scottish Government but other public bodies, too. It was a promise from the whole of Scotland that we all need to make sure that we are keeping.
I am keen to hear how we are managing to get the joined-up working that is required. I would be keen to hear from COSLA whether there is the correct engagement across local authorities. If we could hear from COSLA first, then maybe David Anderson could talk about the experience from his perspective on whether local authorities are managing to get the engagement that they require with the Scottish Government and with other significant public authorities, such as local national health services. Would Nicola Dickie or Fiona Whitelock want to come in first?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
Sorry, what I mean is, on a local level, are we managing to get the people who are all committed to the Promise to work together? The Promise cannot be delivered in silos. It can only be delivered if we all work effectively as team Scotland to deliver something that we have all promised. We are all committed to this. I have not heard anybody saying that they are not committed to the Promise, so we cannot do it in isolation. Are we managing to break down the barriers that have sometimes made such a joined-up piece of work more difficult? Are local authorities experiencing that change and are they managing to work not just for the Scottish Government and not just across their own portfolios, but with big organisations such as the NHS?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
Thanks for that. My next question was going to be whether you were able to start doing that, so that we, as politicians, can make sure that we are putting pressure in the right place. If you have that in hand, that sounds good. Thanks very much. Thank you, convener.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
Are you confident that, even where the Promise is not specifically a clear priority in a local authority area—as in written down—it is still at the fore? When we are talking about changes to policing, is the Promise still being remembered and not just put to the side?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
Stefan Czerniawski or Remmy Jones, would you like to come in?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
Some of the concerns are with things like fillers in cases where people are using social media to say, for instance, “This is what my lips should look like.” In those cases, that is the driving force, rather than a health issue—it is absolutely based on what social media is telling them their face should look like.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
We received some very powerful evidence from Advice Direct Scotland. It was powerful because of the case studies, including those about teenagers as young as 15 being on the end of botched procedures, which got a bit of coverage in the media yesterday, as you will no doubt have seen. That brings us back to a discussion that Sandesh Gulhane led last week on whether 18 is the correct age limit. I am keen to hear your thoughts on that and on whether you have the tools to enforce that—that is, if 18 is the correct age limit. Eighteen is the age that young people can start buying alcohol, but a number of supermarkets, because it is difficult in many cases to identify whether someone is 15 or 18, use the challenge 25 strategy. Do you think that 18 is the right age limit to set, and how would you make sure that it is enforced?