The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2641 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Bob Doris
I have a final question about that. All the bidders will want to make sure that they are fairly treated. There will be a lot of commercial confidentiality in relation to each of the bids, because quality relates to the overall financial cost of the bid that they will put in. Are all the bidders getting equal access to all the data, the information, the paperwork—all the things that I can only imagine are really important—to the nth degree to the same extent as one another, so that it is a fair, open and transparent process?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Bob Doris
Even at this late stage, if I was acting on behalf of one of the bidders, and I was seeking additional information from you, I could request it, but the answer would be given to all six bidders. Is that right?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Bob Doris
CEOs come and go, and what is left is what is in statute—and that is what we have to scrutinise. I would be keen to see the word “consent” in clause 6 as well. I would also be keen to see how the approach will be reviewed in the future in relation to whether the powers that are passed to the UK Government on an operational basis do what it says on the tin and give us the outcomes that we want. It is important for the committee to get a balanced view on the passing of the powers, or on recommending that the powers be passed via an LCM to the UK Government.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Bob Doris
So, you have on-going discussions on clause 6.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Bob Doris
I do not doubt the good will on both sides. However, you talked about future proofing. The strategic priorities are set out at a very high level, and then they will become regionalised, localised and sector specific. They will be realised and have practical implications on the ground across a range of devolved areas—in a positive way, I hope. Agreement to high-level strategic priorities may become detached from the decision making and what happens on the ground. What confidence do you have that the Scottish Government will remain an equal partner in the process, when agreement has been sought and secured from it in relation to the high-level strategic priorities?
That brings us back to clause 6, which talks about directions to GB Energy. In the future, the Scottish Government may think that those directions are at odds with the high-level priorities that it has signed up to. Will you seek to give consent to, or to be consulted on, any directions that are given to GB Energy or its partners under clause 6?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Bob Doris
Does “consent” relate to clause 5 but not to clause 6?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Bob Doris
Is it correct that the contract did not have within it a tolerance level and that it had to be on the nose?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Bob Doris
I will ask the question another way, as those just become numbers. All I want to know is that the ship is being delivered now—
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Bob Doris
If that is the case, it would be within the specification in the original contract. We do not know that yet, but you will check on that this morning, is what you are saying to me.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Bob Doris
If a dead weight of 791 tonnes was within the permitted flexibility, it would have met the contract specifications as originally outlined, because built into that was a degree of flexibility. Is that correct?