Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 21 July 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2048 contributions

|

Social Justice and Social Security Committee

Scottish Employment Injuries Advisory Council Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 23 November 2023

Bob Doris

Is that question for a specific witness?

Social Justice and Social Security Committee

Scottish Employment Injuries Advisory Council Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 23 November 2023

Bob Doris

Are you suggesting that the figure in the bill is a starting point but that, depending on what SEIAC looks at, it might have to flex up its membership to get particular expertise?

Social Justice and Social Security Committee

Scottish Employment Injuries Advisory Council Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 23 November 2023

Bob Doris

I welcome Anna Ritchie Allan, executive director of Close the Gap; Tony Higgins, president of the Professional Footballers Association Scotland; Ian Tasker, chief executive of Scottish Hazards; and Professor Andrew Watterson, occupational and environmental health researcher at the University of Stirling. Thank you for helping us with our scrutiny of the bill.

As I said to the first panel, we are not trying to deter anyone from speaking, but if all four of you want to make the same point, you might want to indicate that. We do not always have to hear that, but we appreciate that sometimes you will want to get things on the record, so please do so when you need to.

I will start with a general question, as I did with the first panel. Would the bill give SEIAC, if it is established, the right balance between scientific expertise and other interests that are important when reaching decisions in relation to the benefit? If not, what changes are desirable, and why?

Social Justice and Social Security Committee

Scottish Employment Injuries Advisory Council Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 23 November 2023

Bob Doris

Katy Clark, do you have any more questions?

Social Justice and Social Security Committee

Scottish Employment Injuries Advisory Council Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 23 November 2023

Bob Doris

Time is almost upon us. I forgot to say this to the first panel, but if there is anything burning within you that you feel you have to get into the Official Report before I close this evidence session, you now have the opportunity to raise it now—as long as it is brief, of course.

Social Justice and Social Security Committee

Scottish Employment Injuries Advisory Council Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 23 November 2023

Bob Doris

I am pleased that I nudged you, because I have inspired Mike Corbett to come in.

Social Justice and Social Security Committee

Scottish Employment Injuries Advisory Council Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 23 November 2023

Bob Doris

Katy Clark, do you want to follow up on any of that?

Social Justice and Social Security Committee

Scottish Employment Injuries Advisory Council Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 23 November 2023

Bob Doris

Anna Ritchie Allan, you have come back to the theme of the glacial pace of progress for female workers time and time again. Is there anything that SEIAC could do to speed up the pace of that?

Social Justice and Social Security Committee

Scottish Employment Injuries Advisory Council Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 23 November 2023

Bob Doris

Paul O’Kane, this is your line of questioning. Do you want to follow up on that?

Social Justice and Social Security Committee

Scottish Employment Injuries Advisory Council Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 23 November 2023

Bob Doris

Do you want to say any more about that, Mr Tasker? I am not remotely trying to be awkward, but the member in charge of the bill, Mr Griffin, will give evidence to the committee and say why he has opted for that number. You have had a discussion with Mr Griffin, and you think that the number is about right. What persuaded you of that? We will need to ask Mr Griffin the same question.