Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Session 6: 13 May 2021 to 8 April 2026
  7. Current session: 14 May 2026 to 13 November 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 68 contributions

|

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]

Women’s Poverty

Meeting date: 1 October 2026

Amanda Lindsay

Thank you.

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice (Overview)

Meeting date: 24 September 2026

Amanda Lindsay

Thank you so much for coming and appearing before us, minister. I share your concerns about cohesion. As we discussed when we met, I also condemn any form of violence and racism. I agree that, in Scotland, we have a proud tradition of welcoming migrants who come here and contribute. However, do you agree that we are at risk of conflating legal immigration with illegal immigration and the small boats crisis that we are, sadly, seeing on the south coast of England?

Immigration is a reserved matter, but housing is not. My constituents are concerned about people who, as they perceive it, are coming here illegally and being housed at taxpayers’ expense. Do you agree that those are valid concerns? Some of the people voicing those concerns to me are legal migrants who have come here in a legal and lawful way.

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice (Overview)

Meeting date: 24 September 2026

Amanda Lindsay

Thank you for clarifying that the Equality Act 2010 will take precedence, that the Government accepts the Supreme Court ruling on sex and gender, and that those terms will be kept separate. However, the paper on the human rights bill proposes putting gender identity in the equality duty but not defining it. What does the Government mean by the term “gender identity”, and what legal effect will it have?

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice (Overview)

Meeting date: 24 September 2026

Amanda Lindsay

Am I right in thinking that the new bill will use the word “sex” only as in “biological sex” and that the concept of gender identity will not appear? If the concept of gender identity is to appear, what is the Government’s definition of it?

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 24 September 2026

Amanda Lindsay

Thank you for coming along today, and for your letter. I want to ask you about the rural fees. I understand that, under the proposed arrangements, officers of the court are entitled to charge 33 per cent more for personal service of documents in remote and rural areas. Why the significant hike? Moreover, how do you define “remote and rural areas”?

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice (Overview)

Meeting date: 24 September 2026

Amanda Lindsay

My next question concerns access to justice. How do you measure the number of people who qualify for legal aid but cannot find a solicitor? That was one of the things that bubbled up during our evidence sessions.

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 24 September 2026

Amanda Lindsay

I am mindful of the number of fee increases, but I acknowledge the evidence that was given on the need to balance that with the reduction in the number of court officials carrying out the work. On Carol Mochan’s point, we must be mindful of the ability of the courts to operate.

I am concerned about two aspects. First, we have heard that the poorest will pay disproportionately more rather than less. Secondly, on Meghan Gallacher’s point about rurality, I understand that the 30 per cent charge dates back to 2012.

I am still reticent about the instruments, because the absence of consultation complaints is not the same as there having been an impact assessment, so that needs to be looked at.

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice (Overview)

Meeting date: 24 September 2026

Amanda Lindsay

Thank you for coming, minister. It is heartening to know that access to justice is a top priority. I am sure that we would all agree on that.

During our evidence sessions, the Scottish Legal Aid Board acknowledged to me the burden that bureaucracy in the system contributes. What could you simplify now, without waiting for the bill? Can you give an example of a change that we could make and a date by which we could hope to have that change made?

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice (Overview)

Meeting date: 24 September 2026

Amanda Lindsay

On the theme of violence against women and girls and cross-portfolio work in that respect, your colleague Neil Gray has stated that domestic abusers and sex offenders will not be part of any early-release scheme. Can you guarantee that?

On the same theme, I am aware that the definition of short-term sentencing is being pushed from four to five years. Will that move to an extra year incorporate the sentences of domestic abusers and sex offenders?

And—[Interruption.] May I ask the final part of my question, convener? I am sorry—it is in three parts.

Elderly long-term prisoners are going to be released, too. Will they include serious criminals such as murderers and sex offenders?

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice (Overview)

Meeting date: 24 September 2026

Amanda Lindsay

No. I asked those questions because the minister’s remit includes victims, and I thought them pertinent, given how potentially dangerous the changes are for women.