Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Session 6: 13 May 2021 to 8 April 2026
  7. Current session: 14 May 2026 to 1 October 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 34 contributions

|

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Post-school education and skills reform”

Meeting date: 17 September 2026

David Kirkwood

I refer you to section 2, “Planning and Delivery of Reform”, which starts on page 19. When I read the headline messages for each part of that section, there does not appear to be a lot of good news. It is pretty much a litany of failure.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Post-school education and skills reform”

Meeting date: 17 September 2026

David Kirkwood

On meeting some tertiary education heads, I received comments that they find the frameworks that the SFC has produced a bit restrictive. There are only 12 or 13 frameworks for graduate apprenticeships, and they find it difficult to provide the exact kind of degree that is necessary within the frameworks. That could be restricting the provision of GAs. I believe they are being changed to become degree apprenticeships, with a name change coming soon.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Post-school education and skills reform”

Meeting date: 17 September 2026

David Kirkwood

Good morning. One thing that popped out for me is the mention, fairly late on in the report, of the universal learner number and the lack of ability to track people through their learning career. I know a bit about that because, for most of 2023, I worked for the UK Government Department for Education as a consultant data architect on a migration project for learning statistics, and I came across that problem there. The department had something that I think was called the universal pupil number, but it was not very useful or robust and was not used much. I wrote a paper of a dozen pages or so describing how to do the universal learner number. I am perfectly happy to share that with anybody who is at all interested. I think that it is robust and works quite well, so I am happy to share that at any time.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Post-school education and skills reform”

Meeting date: 17 September 2026

David Kirkwood

If you give me an idea of who to send it to, I will do that.

There are five recommendations in the report. To paraphrase or extract quickly, you say that the Scottish Government needs to define the intended outcomes; communicate its ambitions for reform to partners; develop a programme delivery plan; and quantify the resources. The Government has not said what it wants to do, it has not told anybody what it intends to do and it has not worked out how it is going to do it or how much money it needs to do it. Would it be a fair summary to say that the Government just needs to get a grip of the project?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Post-school education and skills reform”

Meeting date: 17 September 2026

David Kirkwood

Later in the report, you mention that risks have not been registered or managed adequately. That echoes what we heard last week about the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service. It had a RAID—risks, assumptions, issues and decisions—log, which is good, but it had not done anything with it or updated it for more than two years. Does that show a systemic problem in the Scottish Government when it comes to risk management?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Post-school education and skills reform”

Meeting date: 17 September 2026

David Kirkwood

I will go back to exhibit 2 and to something that Alison Cumming mentioned earlier. Under “Phase 3” and “Maximising outcomes” it says:

“Clearer, more equitable and more efficient … more transparency and accountability … clearer pathways … support economic priorities.”

Before I was a data architect, I spent a lot of years working as a test manager. If a project document had come to me with those terms, it would have been sent straight back, because they are not testable. There is no way to know whether those outcomes have ever been achieved. Do you find such phraseology in many documents that come with Government projects?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Criminal courts backlog follow-up: Transforming for the future”

Meeting date: 10 September 2026

David Kirkwood

So, the impacts are negative.

A couple of paragraphs down from that, the report talks about equality impact assessments and the fact that they are not being done. Would those help in the administration of justice or in the analysis of the results of justice?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Criminal courts backlog follow-up: Transforming for the future”

Meeting date: 10 September 2026

David Kirkwood

Moving on to the Audit Scotland report itself, paragraph 4—which is on page 8 of my copy—says:

“By May 2023, considerable progress had been made in continually reducing the backlog through a courts recovery programme which included increasing court capacity.”

Is that just throwing money at the problem?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Criminal courts backlog follow-up: Transforming for the future”

Meeting date: 10 September 2026

David Kirkwood

I will move on to paragraph 49, which states:

“The programme approach requires data sharing and reporting”.

It also mentions that there are difficulties with data sharing. Why are there difficulties with sharing data?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Criminal courts backlog follow-up: Transforming for the future”

Meeting date: 10 September 2026

David Kirkwood

Is it necessary to standardise data collection?