The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 56 contributions
Rural Affairs Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2026
Dawn Black
I will pick up on the fact that it is a living document. Some of the stakeholders who contributed to the inquiry sessions felt confusion about the end goal of the rural support plan. Will you clarify the Government’s vision for agriculture post-2030, considering quality food production alongside nature restoration, and for how the industry should manage that transition between now and then?
Rural Affairs Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2026
Dawn Black
I have a question about eligibility for support schemes. Some sectors, such as horticulture and market gardens, are currently not supported, often because they are under the 3-hectare minimum area requirements. Could those areas be considered for inclusion? I also note that pig and poultry sectors are not supported, whereas sheep and cattle operations are. Pigs and poultry operations might not take up as much land space, but they are still valid operations and contribute a lot to our economy. Do you think that those could be brought into the schemes?
Rural Affairs Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2026
Dawn Black
Thank you.
Rural Affairs Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2026
Dawn Black
You have already partly answered my follow-up question, but it would be good if you could expand on what you have said. Stakeholders told us that, once peatland is restored, resulting in clear environmental and resilience benefits, landowners cannot necessarily monetise that land. Once they have received funding to restore peatland, what can they do with it? How do we ensure that landowners do not then do something on the peatland that will be detrimental to the environment or our resilience because they want to monetise the land?
Rural Affairs Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2026
Dawn Black
Yes. I would like to focus on the four tiers, if that is okay. As you will have seen, generally there was wide support among stakeholders for the front loading of tier 1 direct payments.
Currently, payments are based on acreage. Is there an argument for front loading payments on the first tranche of acreage and then tapering them as holdings increase? Potentially, payments could be capped, too, because smaller producers would then benefit proportionately more than those with larger operations and landholdings.
Rural Affairs Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2026
Dawn Black
I will move on to peatlands. Cabinet secretary, you have mentioned peatlands a lot already, but I would like to get into the detail. One of the things that came up from speaking to stakeholders was that the costs relating to peatland restoration have increased substantially. Budgets and targets have been put forward for the coming years. Will that budget manage to fund the full peatland action plan target for the years ahead?
11:30
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2026
Dawn Black
I appreciate that it is really difficult not to see the two things together.
The supply chain requirements were welcome in ensuring that Scotland-based suppliers were prioritised in the development of projects. The threshold in that respect was about 25 per cent, which was, we hope, going to raise £29 billion to £41 billion for our economy. I am interested in hearing more about what that has looked like in practice and whether the benefits have been felt at both national and local levels. Have developers found the process challenging? What improvements could be made for future rounds?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2026
Dawn Black
Do you have an opinion on whether that is enough, considering the huge benefits and profits that those companies are making?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2026
Dawn Black
The clarification that you have given is really helpful. Over a period of between 10 and 15 years, changes will occur in the marketplace in relation to what is available in the supply chain, and technologies will progress. For example, last week, in Montrose, there was a big announcement about investment in subsea piles for fixing turbines to the seabed. That is a change—something new that has come in—and future projects in Scotland will be able to utilise that, including, thankfully, in my constituency.
When final plans in a lease do not transpire for utilisation in the Scottish supply chain—obviously, we want as much of the economic benefit to be here—what are the penalties, and are they enough?
Rural Affairs Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2026
Dawn Black
I want to move on to marine planning and offshore wind, which have been mentioned. Looking at the spatial aspect, how does the tension between fisheries and offshore wind impact our biodiversity? Are environmental considerations and consequences adequately addressed in the offshore wind planning and consenting processes? How should strategic compensation for offshore wind and the proposed marine recovery fund operate, and how should all of that be incorporated in the impending national marine plan 2?