The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 77 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2026
Patricia Gibson
So, there is no thinking about capping domestic donations.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2026
Patricia Gibson
So, to be clear, no consideration is being given to the potential risks that are posed by any one organisation or individual in the UK making enormous donations to a particular party.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2026
Patricia Gibson
The minister has said that talks between the Scottish Government and the UK Government on those matters are ongoing. As he pointed out, and as the evidence tells us, there are disputed areas where you do not agree on whether legislative consent is required.
Can the minister update us on how positively that engagement is progressing? Is the Scottish Parliament’s voice, through him, being respected and listened to? Does he have concerns that, if the disputes cannot be settled amicably—we all hope that they will be—we might end up in a situation where powers over aspects of elections for the Scottish Parliament are impinged on in ways that we do not agree with?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2026
Patricia Gibson
I have a question about the cap on donations. For very good reasons, we want to ensure that the money that is collected by or donated to political parties is from the UK and that there is no undue external influence. I am wondering about the cap on donations from organisations. We tend to focus on businesses, but what impact will the cap on donations have on other organisations that donate to political parties, such as trade unions? Does anybody have any thoughts on that?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2026
Patricia Gibson
Why might that be?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2026
Patricia Gibson
The committee heard evidence from Professor Toby James, who has called for the abolition of the open register. Do you have any thoughts on that?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2026
Patricia Gibson
I have a question on the retrospective aspect of donations. As the professor said, it is never ideal to legislate retrospectively. I am concerned about the practicality—the reality—of doing that, because it will take us back to a situation in which there are lots of disputes and arguments and counter-arguments from people who might be impacted by attempts to claw back or have moneys returned. I wonder whether it will add to the complexity of whatever genuine and well-meaning reforms are being made, and whether it might end up in court actions and disputes. Is there any precedent in any other field of endeavour of retrospective legislation leading to such a rabbit hole?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2026
Patricia Gibson
Does that mean that there are two types of open register: a commercial one and a political one?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2026
Patricia Gibson
Thank you for clarifying that.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2026
Patricia Gibson
We are talking about trying to reinvigorate political engagement, but would the change create barriers for political parties and candidates if the register became incomplete for their information purposes in using it as a campaigning tool?