The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 16 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 June 2026
David Linden
In your excellent report “Remand Prisoners’ Experiences in the Scottish Prison System: An HMIPS Analytical Review”, you say that those on remand are not offered, for example, the work experience opportunities that they are meant to be offered, which goes back to the issue of staffing resources. In Scotland, are we at risk of flouting the Mandela rules when it comes to how we look after people in the prison system?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 June 2026
David Linden
When people enter the prison system, does adequate screening take place to check for neurodivergence and other health issues that people might have?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 June 2026
David Linden
I will be very brief, because my question follows on slightly from the issues pertaining to mortality that Mr Kerr raised. If I understood you earlier, Sara, you were basically suggesting that the Scottish Prison Service and/or the Scottish Government do not have a strategy for dealing with the older prison population. Is that right?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 June 2026
David Linden
I have not lodged a motion to annul the instrument, because the order that is before the committee seeks to make provision for a gap that would otherwise exist.
I want to make a comment and to declare an interest. Until recently, the Dogs Trust was the insurance provider. Its rehoming centre is based in the Broomhouse area of my constituency.
It is important that we, as Parliamentarians, place on record our thanks to the Dogs Trust and recognise that it stepped in to provide insurance on a short-term basis. That all came about as a result of the ban on XL bullies. However, clearly, the trust is not set up to do that. It has cost the trust an inordinate amount of money, and I know that it has raised a number of concerns.
The order simply makes provision for a gap that would otherwise exist, which is the result of market failure in the insurance industry.
One point that I want to place on record relates to quite a technical issue. The Dogs Trust freedom project allows survivors of domestic abuse, and those fleeing it, to place their dog in the care of the Dogs Trust. Currently, the legislation states that an exempted XL bully can be separated from its owner for only a 30-day window, but data from the freedom project shows that those dogs spend somewhere between six to nine months in care. I say that largely so that it is on the record for the Scottish Government to be mindful of, because the current situation is not working particularly well.
The order that is before the committee is appropriate—it fills a gap that would otherwise exist in legislation, so I support it.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 17 June 2026
David Linden
My constituency includes HMP Barlinnie, which is Scotland’s largest prison, so there will be occasions when I will ask questions in my capacity as a member of the committee and also as the constituency MSP for Riddrie.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 17 June 2026
David Linden
I am very grateful, convener. As I was making my way to the Parliament this morning, I was conscious that this is now the third Parliament in which you and I have worked, with my having started out as an intern for you in Europe at the end of the late noughties and then our serving at Westminster together.
I am grateful for the opportunity to serve the committee as deputy convener. We know that there are a number of challenges in front of us in relation to the criminal justice system, some of which we will get on to later in our discussion today. It is important that, as we come to this committee, we do so to support our public servants, to protect the integrity of our institutions and to ensure that the public can have confidence in those institutions. As a committee, we should follow the evidence and perhaps leave the dogma of party politics at the door to ensure that we interrogate not just ministers but policy without fear or favour. If we do that, we will get on very well as a committee. It is certainly my intention to serve in that capacity.