Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Session 6: 13 May 2021 to 8 April 2026
  7. Current session: 14 May 2026 to 21 September 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 76 contributions

|

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Criminal courts backlog follow-up: Transforming for the future”

Meeting date: 10 September 2026

Alan Brown

I have one more question. You mentioned a couple of times—I should have asked about this earlier—the success of the summary case management system and 11,000 police citations not being required. That is a fantastic potential saving on police resource. Has that been quantified? If 11,000 police citations is equivalent to even half a day, that is a fantastic resource saving that really should be quantified. I dare say that Police Scotland will say, “We see that saving,” but that is a fantastic potential saving in resource.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Criminal courts backlog follow-up: Transforming for the future”

Meeting date: 10 September 2026

Alan Brown

Modelling has been done on the number of cases that there might be in the future. Does that modelling show that there will continue to be an increase in the number of historical sexual abuse cases, or will we reach a peak in the system before the number decreases?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Criminal courts backlog follow-up: Transforming for the future”

Meeting date: 10 September 2026

Alan Brown

Does the future modelling—I know that this might not be covered in your report, but I am asking given that the issue has come up—that shows a continued increase in the number of cases and in waiting times include resource assumptions? I know that there are complexities, but is the situation also dependent on resource? If a resource assumption goes into the modelling and if that resource is provided or exceeded, clearly, that can improve things but, conversely, if the resource is not there, it will only go one way.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Criminal courts backlog follow-up: Transforming for the future”

Meeting date: 10 September 2026

Alan Brown

I do not want to hog the time, convener, but that leads on to the summary court stuff, so can I ask about that?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Criminal courts backlog follow-up: Transforming for the future”

Meeting date: 10 September 2026

Alan Brown

Obviously, there is a good news story about the waiting list or backlog—whatever the term is—in the summary court system. As I understand it, a lot of that is attributable to summary case management. Could the lessons learned on that be applied to the High Court and create improvements there?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Criminal courts backlog follow-up: Transforming for the future”

Meeting date: 10 September 2026

Alan Brown

In relation to cases not requiring witnesses and being able to conclude early and not going to trial, I note from your figures that, in non-domestic abuse cases, earlier resolution increased from 51 to 59 per cent and that, for domestic abuse cases, the figure increased from 31 to 39 per cent. On the face of it, that seems really good, but does earlier resolution mean that there are more guilty pleas and convictions? Does it mean an increase in convictions at an earlier stage?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Criminal courts backlog follow-up: Transforming for the future”

Meeting date: 10 September 2026

Alan Brown

That is what I was trying to get a feel for. Are there more convictions in the cases that are resolved? Do we know the breakdown of those figures?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Criminal courts backlog follow-up: Transforming for the future”

Meeting date: 10 September 2026

Alan Brown

I have a question on that. I understand why the pre-Covid period was used for the initial report in 2023, as well as for this follow-up report, and that is due to the massive spike post-Covid. However, is it right to always use Covid as year zero? What was the trend before Covid when compared with the historical low? Was it going up or down? Should there be work done to assess what the trend was in the historical context, rather than just compared with before the pandemic?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Criminal courts backlog follow-up: Transforming for the future”

Meeting date: 10 September 2026

Alan Brown

I will go back to an issue that has come up a couple of times in answers about the programme manager position not being filled and that leading, for example, to there being no risk register. Your report says that the Scottish Government has found it hard to fill the programme manager position. Have there been any discussions about what the difficulty is? Is it a difficulty in identifying the right person, or are people just not coming forward?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Criminal courts backlog follow-up: Transforming for the future”

Meeting date: 10 September 2026

Alan Brown

On that basis, does the Scottish Government recognise that the programme manager position should be filled in order to properly lead these projects, manage risks and do the proper planning? That is clearly another issue. When it comes to filling that position, is it recognised that it is fundamental that we get someone in there? In order to identify that key resource, it is necessary to look across resources, rather than having siloed departments.