Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Session 6: 13 May 2021 to 8 April 2026
  7. Current session: 14 May 2026 to 10 November 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 66 contributions

|

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 28 October 2026

Hannah Mary Goodlad

Of the remaining pot, £807 million has not been used. As you know, £80 million has been allocated for this year’s budget. As I have said to the committee on numerous occasions in response to numerous questions—serious, valid questions—the financial situation for next year is incredibly challenging. This year’s situation is challenging, and next year’s will be even more challenging.

With regard to how much we will have to allocate, a substantial amount of the ScotWind pot is being looked at for planned usage. Regardless of whether that comes to pass, the Government is working incredibly hard to ensure that we do not have to dip into that, but it is a backstop that is there for us to use as a safety net. In a few hours’ time, negative consequentials will arise as a result of the UK Government’s allocation of funding to the defence investment plan.

As I reiterated in a previous answer to you, ScotWind funding has been allocated as a backstop for the past four years, but the size of the pot has been reduced in only one of those years. It is a safety net that I wish we did not have to use, but given all the financial challenges that we face and the squeeze on our public finances, it would be unwise of the Government not to consider all the backstops that are available. I hope that that helps.

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 28 October 2026

Hannah Mary Goodlad

Is the question whether the money should be allocated to specific portfolios?

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 28 October 2026

Hannah Mary Goodlad

I will pass that on to my official. Scott, perhaps you can deal with the recurring spend.

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 28 October 2026

Hannah Mary Goodlad

It might not. I will certainly not impose a heavy-handed cap on the cost, because I do not think that it is right for a minister to start getting involved with an independent review.

The project management of the inquiries also involves fiscal prudence. It is a culture that we all need to live and breathe as the Government, as public bodies and as parliamentarians until 2030 and probably beyond, because the financial situation that I see will not improve in the next five years. Everybody has to have that culture, top down and bottom up.

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 28 October 2026

Hannah Mary Goodlad

—eight months ago, then again—

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 28 October 2026

Hannah Mary Goodlad

I have given you an answer on what the figure correlates to: the increase in pay and operational costs, the increased cost of the exam diet for curriculum for excellence and pay awards and inflation. I have given you quite a detailed response, Mr Kerr. Clearly, this is something that the Conservatives are prioritising, and I look forward to seeing it as part of your budget requests—including on the living wage, which I very much welcome.

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 28 October 2026

Hannah Mary Goodlad

The Scottish Government estate, and the Scottish Government civil service, cost £225 million per annum to run. Last year, an assessment was carried out of the estate, the buildings and the degradation that we have across the portfolio, and of the number of staff and colleagues that we have, to see what levels of funding would be required to safety proof and safeguard the Scottish Government estate and Scottish Government civil service going forward.

Several scenarios were detailed in that assessment. There was business as usual; a scenario for the advisory must-do improvements to the estate and corporate running costs; and invest to save. The additional £14.5 million was to continue with a business-as-usual approach not only to the estate but to our colleagues and staff across the service. Therefore, that funding is not an uplift to increase delivery or provision but what will be necessary to maintain core business-as-usual services, the statutory functions of the civil service and the critical corporate infrastructure. The funding is not an uplift to future proof the estate or service—it is all about maintaining business as usual.

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 28 October 2026

Hannah Mary Goodlad

Yes.

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 28 October 2026

Hannah Mary Goodlad

Well, I have an hour.

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 28 October 2026

Hannah Mary Goodlad

It is significant. Can I say one last thing on that?