Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Session 6: 13 May 2021 to 8 April 2026
  7. Current session: 14 May 2026 to 30 September 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 88 contributions

|

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Domestic Abuse (Justice Response)

Meeting date: 23 September 2026

Pauline McNeill

I want to understand more about bail in general: who gets bail, who does not get bail, what happens with breaches of bail and so on.

Dr Forbes, when the Crown opposes bail, to what extent does the sheriff take that as a factor? Are there lots of cases in which the sheriff will consider that but decides for other reasons that bail will be granted?

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Domestic Abuse (Advocacy and Victim Experience)

Meeting date: 23 September 2026

Pauline McNeill

I am interested in the possible use of GPS technology for perpetrators of domestic violence. I do not need to tell you about the horrific cases that have been reported. Stacy Hunter’s family has called for the quick introduction of GPS, which the Government has committed to. What is your view on that, and do you think it could make a difference?

I caught the tail end of Stephen Kerr talking about the risk that sheriffs are not in a position to take. It is really important to try to get this right.

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Domestic Abuse (Justice Response)

Meeting date: 23 September 2026

Pauline McNeill

That should be assessed, regardless.

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Domestic Abuse (Advocacy and Victim Experience)

Meeting date: 23 September 2026

Pauline McNeill

To be honest, I think that everybody is aware of that, but I am surprised, because I thought that GPS was available—I thought that that was just about the extent of it—but I realise that we do not have it at all.

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Domestic Abuse (Advocacy and Victim Experience)

Meeting date: 23 September 2026

Pauline McNeill

Lastly, on that question of risk, there are professional people whose job it is to assess risk—the Risk Management Authority does that for certain offenders. Is there a need to have a look at who could make the assessment about risk in those cases? I know that the victim telling their experience to the sheriff could be one way, but that is a subjective viewpoint that the sheriff has to factor in, and maybe there must be more objectivity. Would it be helpful to consider changing the system so that more information is factored in when the case goes in front of the sheriff and they make a decision?

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Domestic Abuse (Justice Response)

Meeting date: 23 September 2026

Pauline McNeill

With respect, I know all that. I am just trying to make it clear that I have a real concern that we are not going fast enough in freeing up the officers whom we need to attend these kinds of calls.

If there is a breach of bail, does what happens to the person in question depend on the severity of the breach? Does the matter automatically go back to court?

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Domestic Abuse (Justice Response)

Meeting date: 23 September 2026

Pauline McNeill

A physical presence would be regarded as requiring an urgent response.

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Domestic Abuse (Justice Response)

Meeting date: 23 September 2026

Pauline McNeill

You were asked about resources earlier. Perhaps I can give you a specific example. In last week’s evidence session, we talked about the amount of police time that is taken up dealing with mental health calls. I know that work is ongoing on that, but, in reality, officers might be sitting in accident and emergency with a person in distress at the same time as a call goes out requiring an urgent response to a breach of bail involving a domestic abuse victim. Is that correct?

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Domestic Abuse (Advocacy and Victim Experience)

Meeting date: 23 September 2026

Pauline McNeill

That is a practical thing that could be done within the system to make sure that there is a consistent approach across all courts.

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Domestic Abuse (Justice Response)

Meeting date: 23 September 2026

Pauline McNeill

I am thinking of a number of high-profile cases, including one that I referred to recently in which the family involved called for GPS technology to be one of the factors. I just wonder whether we are missing anything here that we should be doing in criminal justice to try to catch cases where an offender has been bailed and then goes on to kill someone.