The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1894 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
Excellent.
As always, minister, if anything comes to mind for either members or yourself, we know how to reach out to each other. I thank you and your officials for your time this morning.
Meeting closed at 11:33.Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
I am sorry, Karen, but can you just clarify something? Do you mean that they are elected, because they are MSPs who have come into the Parliament or because they are technically elected by the committee? Are you talking about their route into this Parliament?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
I suppose that the purpose of my question is to find out whether that individual needs support, in primary legislation, to make those decisions. In some areas, one could see there being conflicting views on such decisions. Perhaps having very open, strong guidance—even just on a minimum number of sites—would reinforce and support those decisions without opening the petition officer up to criticism.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
From an administrative point of view, the mechanics suggest limiting it, but—I do not want to use the word “automation”—electronification of electoral registration may make it easier. Would it be reviewed at that stage?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
Those provisions should apply to the petition process, the subsequent regional poll and/or a by-election. That is probably easier with regard to constituency by-elections, but the point should be made specifically in relation to regional polls and behaviour during the petition period.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
Under the proposal in the bill, the question in the petition is, in essence, a finite one and, when the 10 per cent threshold is reached, there will be a recall. Should we simply rely on that finite question and, when it is answered, say, “There will be a recall,” or have you seen from previous examples any value in a petition staying open, given the constraint that people can say only, “Yes”?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
The reality is that, with the deep hope that the situation will happen infrequently, the exercise has to start every time that the situation occurs.
I want to go back to the challenges with regard to registration. A lot of the evidence that has been submitted relates to the challenges that occur if another local by-election is being held at the council level. Do we need to bring together the systems in respect of whether a person is or is not on that register, to take account of that challenge? I accept that that situation is administratively challenging, but is it one that, if the right level of clarification were to be given about the cut-off dates, could be made to work administratively?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
I think that I am pushing at the point that the petition is not an electoral event but that, for the purposes of the behaviour of those who—
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
Thank you for giving evidence to the committee. I will suspend the meeting for a short while to allow for a change of panel members.
10:09 Meeting suspended.Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
I welcome to the meeting our second panel for today’s evidence taking. We are joined by Sarah Mackie, head of the Electoral Commission in Scotland, and Jenny Brotchie, acting head of Scottish affairs at the Information Commissioner’s Office. Good morning to both of you. Graham Simpson, as the sponsoring MSP of the bill in question, is still with us, so I welcome him a second time.
If it is all right with the panel, I will move straight to questions. In the first instance, I want to look at time periods and the fact that the bill proposes a period of four weeks for the petition process rather than the six weeks that occurs in other places, particularly at Westminster, and which people are becoming used to. Is there a good reason to curtail the period to four weeks, or is it outweighed by the fact that having similar electoral periods might help people’s understanding?
Sarah, would you like to kick off?